Writers of spam live mysterious lives



Because everything on the internet is true, and people I do not know are nice enough to seek me out and make contact with me so we can be friends forever send poems to me I think we should share our benefactors wisdoms.

For instance such elegance as this

wife fascinate parents human mischievous already. she sandwich human. studied prison similar.
she studied out few off nothing.

We learn here that Mr Noriko’s (my new best friend, sender of this email) wife is a real people’s person and she is adored by her surroundings, especially the inmates at the prison at which she works extra in the kitchen when she is not studying.

He continues by asking me questions, remembering that true friendship comes from not keeping secrets.

a wrong whom parents make appearance? taught latter promised thus companion rich?
disappoint yours reference here. fascinate yours am profession speaking letters? my am bad social why,
night somewhere being friends
I will answer your questions here Kori. My parents have always been very supportive of me, even when I bought the wrong clothes. And I am so sorry to hear about your companion running off with all the money you had made together. I understand your dissapointment. I should listen more to audio books, you are right about that. I hope we can be friends even though your social skills plummet when it gets dark.


your post makes me think of this article i read the other day:


Spam gets personal
5/2/2006 12:40:21 PM, by Nate Anderson

North America, though no longer the world leader in spam production, still has serious potted meat problems. A recent research paper out of the University of Calgary suggests that those problems could soon be a lot worse if spam creators adopt a few simple data-mining procedures.

John Aycock is a computer science professor who teaches classes in “Spam and Spyware” and “Computer Viruses and Malware.” His newest research project, done in conjunction with Nathan Friess, imagines an evolutionary step in the use of spam zombies that could dramatically increase their effectiveness. The paper, “Spam Zombies from Outer Space”, shows how effective spammers could be if they sifted the zombie computer’s e-mail archives and generated messages in that particular user’s style.“There are two key reasons why spam is suspicious to anti-spam filters and human targets alike. First, it often comes from an unrecognized source. Second, it doesn’t look right. The evolution of spam zombies will change this. These new zombies will mine corpora of e-mail they find on infected machines, using this data to automatically forge and send improved, convincing spam to others. In addition to the adversary, there are two other parties involved here: the victim, who owns a zombie machine, and whose saved e-mail the adversary will be mining; the target, currently on infected, that the adversary wants to click on something.”

That “convincing spam” is generated by looking at factors such as vocabulary, the length of individual lines, the use of capitalization, signatures, abbreviations, misspellings, and more. The malware then generates a reply to a legitimate e-mail on the user’s computer and appends its own message and payload (attachment or URL), and does so in the victim’s own style and with his or her own signature. The result is much harder to distinguish from traditional spam, and would make it through most current anti-spam screening programs.

The authors tested their theory on two e-mail data sets: a small data set that they had created and the much larger public data set of Enron e-mail. Their results were quite positive. Using only simple data-mining techniques, their software successfully generated legitimate-looking reply messages that lacked all the usual spam telltales.

Fortunately for those who detest spam, the authors also present four new defenses that could help stop this newer, more personalized spam. First, e-mail archives can be encrypted, making it difficult for malware to mine them for information. Second, these archives can also be “salted” with false information such as spam trap addresses. Third, the authors suggest that all URLs followed from an e-mail client be viewed in a “sandboxed” browser that would prevent automatic downloads. Finally, anti-spam filters can be adjusted to better screen for these types of attacks. Some might argue that publishing such research will only guarantee that the ideas are used by spammers, but the authors are convinced that such personalization will happen sooner or later anyway, and that it’s better to be prepared for the inevitable than not to talk about it.

       [ [Discuss](http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/ubb.x?a=dl&s=50009562&f=174096756&x_id=1146591621&x_subject=Spam+gets+personal&x_link=http://arstechnica.com&x_ddp=Y) ]