Which is better Verbatim mcc03 or Fuji TY02 +s?

vbimport

#1

I can get either of these, which burns better at 8x? Thanks


#2

mcc03 verbatim, is that the 16x? Those would be better at 8x Id say.


#3

mattyboy wrote:

mcc03 verbatim, is that the 16x?

mcc03 verbatim isn’t 16x dvd media, it’s 8x speed media.


PLEXTOR 708A DVDRW
PIONEER 107D DVDRW
LITEON 811 DVDRW
BENQ 1620 DVDRW (2)
TOSHIBA (2)1612 DVD-ROM
PLEXTOR 48X24X48 CDRW
PENT 4 HT 3.00C, 800 FSB, PENT 4 2.40 533 FSB
ASUS MOBO’s P4P800SE (2)
1GB CRUCIAL PC3200 MEMORY, 1GB CRUCIAL PC2700
WESTERN DIGITAL 36GB RAPTOR HARD DRIVE
MAXTOR 200 GB HARD DRIVE
MAXTOR (2)250 GB HARD DRIVEs
MAXTOR 200 GB SATA HARD DRIVE
MAXTOR (2)120 GB HARD DRIVEs
MAXTOR 60 GB HARD DRIVE
ANTEC TRUE POWER 480 WATT POWER SUPPLY
ANTEC TRUE POWER 430 WATT POWER SUPPLY
ANTEC SLK2650 CASE, ANTEC SLK2600AMB CASE
CANOPUS ADVC-100 ANALOG TO DIGITAL CONVERTER
MAXTOR ATA -133 PCI CONTROLLER CARDS


#4

Both burn great constantly at 12X with incredibly low error counts.
TY T02 are a tad better.


#5

Depends on the batch you can get. My batch, MCC003 burns better @12x than TYT02 @12x.

MCC003@12x: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=795724&postcount=125
TYT02 @12x: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=795736&postcount=128

I still like the advantage of T02 can be overspeed to 16x.


#6

mattyboy, how can you tell mcc003 would be better if you don’t even know that it’s 8x rated?


#7

Only 47 PIF on TYT02? Amazing!!! :bow:


#8

Here is a scan of mine, mada on TYT02 at 12x speed with Nero 6.6.0.1
http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=792657&postcount=497


#9

I got a 96% quality score in CD-DVD Speed for MCC003 and 95% for TYT02, both burned at 8x.
Burned at 12x, I got 96% for MCC003 and 98% (!) for TYT02.
The TYT02 @ 12x gives a higher PI-error count (3.06 versus 1.57 for MCC003), but a very low PIF count (0.02, 117 total).


#10

Quality Score in Nero CDSpeed is somehow misleading, IMO. I am talking about v3.5x, haven’t check v3.61 yet. I think Erik (the author) gives PIF more weight to obtain the score.

For example this post: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showpost.php?p=750703&postcount=186
1st pic: max PIE 19, max PIF 8, QS 95%, while
2nd pic: max PIE 295(!), max PIF 7, QS 96%.


#11

I know from my LiteOn days that PIF’s are a lot more serious; I believe a PIE of max 240 was still acceptable, while PIF should not be more than 4 preferably. Not sure how that translates to the Benq scans though. And I agree that the -r scan you showed (with average 145 PIE) seems very questionable.
As for the Verbatim vs TY (Fuji in my case), the TY gives me constantly higher PIE rates (2 - 4 times higher).