'his (Mr Syfert) form motions are a money-making scheme'
and what USCG is doing isn't a 'money making scheme'? gimme a break! at least what Syfert is doing seems to be a legal, legitimate scheme, which is more than can be said for USCG. strange how one side of the fence (entertainment industries/copyright industries and their douchebag lawyers) cant put up with anyone standing up for themselves or being helped to stand up for themselves. what would they do/are doing if/when they are accused of what they are doing? as usual, they want one set of rules for them and different rules (roll over, play dead and pay up, even though innocent!) for people!!