Thanks for the warm welcolm, Xercus !
Where do RedFox fit in with a Slysoft marketing campaign from back in 2010 when RedFox did not even exist at the time?
Sorry I did not make myslef quite clear. What I was trying to say is that SlySoft used to use an unethical way, or marketing strategy, to lure more people buy their lifetime licenses. Of course, RedFox did not exist back then. But now RedFox is run by the same guys (except the CEO? Whos knows?), and they are planning to drop to lifetime model, who knows it is not another marketing ploy?
Where in the so far short story of RedFox, does your 2010 Slysoft registration fit in and how can you say you have to pay again?
I got the information from the RedFox forum, they are planning to dishonor the previous SlySoft lifetime license holders, by aksing them pay again in the future. Althrough the details are still to be ironed out yet, they seem to have made up their minds. You can check it out yourself at https://forum.redfox.bz/threads/redfox-addresses-slysoft-license-concerns.68578/
Slysoft was according to multiple reports shut down by AACS-LA in February.
SlySoft website was not shutdown by AACS-LA, they had made it very clear in RedFox forum that they shut it down themselves, not an authority. Suppose if AACS-LA shut it down, would AACS-LA be kind enough to leave the Forum untouched so that people can talking bullshit about them? Tom, one RedFox staff member also admitted this in RedFox Forum. In case you did not see it, you can now check it here https://forum.redfox.bz/threads/slysoft-closed.68304/page-2#post-423812, and you are looking for #29
Edit: I am not trying to persuade anyone who don't mind supporting RedFox to turn their back on it, but I do want those do mind to be careful, think twice, after all, noboby guarantees me so far that RedFox won't change its name again and make me pay a third time. Just like your own signature says, even this site might not be trusted, so we need to always try to protect ourselves, don't we! :bigsmile: