WOAH... fellas fellas! I was NOT complaining.. I was merely asking an innocent question!
I totally understand the need to not base results on quality scans alone.. why do you think I posted the question: "Am I over-reacting?" Thanks for your hospitality, I guess I got my answer. :Z
Yeah, I'm considered a noobie with regards to posting.. but I'm an experienced reader.. and no matter how many threads I've visited over the years, I still got worried when the PIE and PIF totals were multiplied by about six! How was I supposed to know this was within normal operating parameters? I've never seen anybody report this before.
Maybe somebody can show me what a fake TY scan looks like? Don't go pointing me in the direction of the fake TY thread please, as I've already been there.
I hate to say it, but geez, you guys have really lost it..
I know ALL about quality scans.. how to rely on them, when to not, etc. etc. I know they mean little without a complimentary benchmark and/or scandisk. I was simply under the impression that six times a figure was a big difference, that's all!
Thank you for your kind, warm, and welcoming answers folks. I look forward to asking more questions. :Z