Some scans of overspeeded DVD-media

speed
scans
dvd
overspeed

#1

kyrcy asked me about scans in an other topic, so I post here some scans from media I overspeeded. Don´t wonder about the different scan-drives, I have many drives :wink:


Samsung SH-224GB
DVD burners reach higher DVD speeds than BD burners?
#2

Media: Intenso DVD+R 16x
Mediacode:(AML 003)
Writer: Pioneer DVR-S20
Speed: 20x
Scanner: LG GH24NSB0 Q93


#3

Media: Plextor DVD+R 16x
Mediacode: (YUDEN000 T03)
Writer: LiteOn iHas 524
Speed: 20x
Scanner: Benq 1640


#4

Media: Plextor DVD+R 16x
Mediacode: (YUDEN000 T03)
Writer: LiteOn iHas 524
Speed: 20x
Scanner: Benq 1640


#5

Media: Plextor DVD-R 16x
Mediacode: (TYG03)
Writer: LiteOn iHas 524
Speed: 20x
Scanner: LiteOn iHAS 524


#6

Media: Plextor DVD-R 16x
Mediacode: (TYG03)
Writer: Pioneer DVR-S20
Speed: 24x
Scanner: Benq 1640

It´s hard to do 24x with a Pioneer. Pioneer offers with many media overspeeding but it likes to switch during writing to lower speed


#7

Media: Verbatim DVD+R 16x
Mediacode: (MCC 004)
Writer: LG GH-20N EL00
Speed: 20x
Scanner: Benq 1640


#8

Media: Verbatim DVD+R 16x
Mediacode: (MCC 004)
Writer: Pioneer DVR-S20
Speed: 22x, speeddown to 12x
Scanner: Samsung SH-222BB

Here is a scan of a speeddown from 22x to 12x. But I dunno at which point it happened


#9

Media: Verbatim DVD-R 16x
Mediacode: (MCC 03RG20)
Writer: LG GH-22NS40 NL01
Speed: 22x
Scanner: Lite ihas 124


#10

Media: Verbatim DVD-R 16x
Mediacode: (MCC 03RG20
Writer: Pioneer DVR 215 1.18
Speed: 20x
Scanner: Benq 1640


#11

Media: Verbatim DVD-R 16x
Mediacode: (MCC 03RG20
Writer: Pioneer DVR 215 1.18
Speed: 20x
Scanner: LiteOn iHAS 524


#12

Some scans look OK, but some don’t.


#13

Same can happen to media you burned at lower speed

IMHO the newer media is not so good like the media I bought many years ago, maybe because it is cheaper now


#14

Why do you scan at maximum speed? Do you have an iHAS124 C? I suspect that this drive often reports high PI errors (compared to earlier and later LiteOn models) and I want to confirm it (I have a LiteOn and two clones and all behave the same).


#15

Nope, I have a 124 F

Some media with some drives shiws much higher PI and sometimes PIF-rates, but AFAIK it´s the combination.

Look here at the last posts

I have also a 524 B, but it is not usable for (most) +R because it recognize it as +RW


#16

I think you are talking about scanning at different speeds and having different results. I am talking about scanning at the same speed and still having different results. And you are comparing results when using the same drive to scan, but I am comparing results when using two drives.


#17

Does not look bad.


#18

Same error rate overall?


#19

I also have a DVD-RW with msuikvideos.

Jokes aside, I think that MCSE can enforce 20× burning speed even on 4× media. But that would not look great then.


#20

Some look good, but some to bad for the used media. Burn with lower speeds from 8x, 12x or 16x would bring better results with this high quality media