Now that this is raised in the media forum and not in the Samsung forum, where I would risk lynchage for writing what I’m about to write , let me ask you a question: why all these raving opinions about these 203B burns reported there… I’ve parsed the scans of these high-speed burns and all the ones showing the jitter graph show [I] frankly out-of-specs jitter[/I].
I’m under the impression that once again, our dear CDFreaks have tunnel vision fixed on PIE/PIF figures exclusively, forgetting that ECMA standards also include a max for jitter…
@[B]megatron[/B]: even in the 203B, I suggest you avoid overspeeding media, even the best media, unless you’re in a rush and you neither need to keep the data on the disc for long nor need to be sure the disc will play in a wide array of drives. The reason why is in my OT point above.
Like others, I recommend 16X +R Verbatims for your burner.
May I also recommend you to check the 203B scans thread in the Samsung forum? You can’t find more reports of 203B burns with varied media than there are in that thread…