Thank you for your comment, however I do feel it’s a bit strange that the IFPI is after people who are selling e.g. CloneCD and doesn’t go after S.A.D. who is selling and promoting at least one copy tool that can be considered competition of CloneCD and which is promoted with ‘Extended copy protection recognition’. The IFPI seems to have double standards. There is not much more research to be done, the facts are on the internet, for everyone to read. Of course it’s up to every individual to draw their own conclusions.