Pioneer DVR-110/A10XL 1.37 PI/PO Scans on Various MIDS

vbimport

#21

http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=161451


#22

My thoughts exactly Lightining UK! I have your masterpiece backed up forever on some yudens :bow:
I will be updating this thread with some more burn/scans with some more older and newer +RW media by MCCA01(i think it is) and some newer from cmc… most of it is still 2.4 media but still a good test…plus I have the better batch of MCC003 to try yet. for now I have to go see a neurologist, I seem to have fall asleep in a chair a week ago with pressure on my arm above my elbow and woke to find my wrist just flops (symptoms of Saturday Night Palsy) at least thats what i thought it was till a week later I woke up with the same thing happening to my left…so its pretty hard to type or grab anything. I hope it is not somthing serious! I want to be able to use my hands again normaly. :sad:
see you guys later on…


#23

wow dude, I hope your seeing a doctor, sounds kinda serious.

LUK!, I don’t know why but my results are consistently better using DVD.d., to the point where I won’t waste another disc with it. Using SL and DL discs.


#24

Hope everything’s okay, Tweakmaster. Please let us know how you’re doing.


#25

‘waste’… you make it sound like it’s making coasters compared to DVD Decrypter!

Out of interest, what format discs do you generally use (and have you tested with) ?

Are we talking mainly DVD+R, mainly DVD-R or a total mixture of both?


#26

Okay ‘waste’ is too harsh, but the error rate is higher. I use mostly +R and +RDL. Your efforts are greatly appreciated, and I was very excited about IMGburn. I do not want people to think that dvd.d is better, I just suggested to try both programs and compare the results. Since your interested I’ll follow up with some scans (none at the moment) that directly compare my results. Although I don’t want to waste +RDL on the same data, I’ll see what I can do. :slight_smile:


#27

Please don’t go burning +R DL on my account!!

However if you have a few normal -R / +R going spare, please by my guest and show scans comparing the two programs on your system. :slight_smile:


#28

from my experience, the results I get are the same besides your common variation in media and burns etc. now I use decrypter to …well decrypt and now IMGBURN to burn…I like the sample graph feature although I been playing with the ave. vs. sample slider in dvdinfopro trying to figure it out, I just leave it at ave. for now…
on a side note, went to the hospital last night and they didnt do anything but blood tests that came back normal…and said I had to see a neurologist (which cost $$$$ I dont have) plus I have no med insurance and in the middle of a dissability claim for the last year. This really sucks… I really hope this isn’t permanent… :sad: but almost 2 weeks now with no improvement. now my only hope is seeing my pain managment doctor on tuesday and hopfully he refers me through my auto insurance(from accident last year) to a neurologist.
man im only 29, whats next?? :frowning:
what a way to end christamas and start a new year huh :doh:
thanks guys for the support :slight_smile:
Ill update this thread and try to keep it going with more scans asap :iagree:

(note):sorry for the poor formating of my text, it is challeging to type like this.


#29

So I started a new thread in a more appropriate forum. I tested 4 SL discs for comparison. Normally I use nero for SL, but just to get it started I posted some SL burns from DVD.D. and IMGburn.

http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=161994


#30

Back again to add a new burn&scan result. This time with The lightscribe Verbatim MCC003(good batch) Burned @8x with IMGBURN.
I scaned it with the Pioneer and the benQ after unlocking the drive in cdspeed :clap:







#31

I don’t remember my 110 working that well with cdspeed! I have to give it a shot again :slight_smile:


#32

you using Pioneer A10XL FW or the buffalo 8.37? that might be it…
My drive seems to like cd speed better then DVDinfoPro for some reason…scans more consistant… I dont really have a use for bitsetting since i got my LG-LDA-511, that thing plays whatever I throw at it… :smiley:
Also notice im getting good burns with IMGBURN…haven’t seen a variation like in you comparison…


#33

Same recording scanned on BENQ1640 AND PIONEER A10XL:




#34

I started scanning a disc with 8.37, I set cdspeed to read it at 8x, but it looked more like 4-6x, so I aborted :slight_smile: too long for me.

Burned at 6x with 8.37 with dvd.d. Its not a full disc, but the burn was fast!
The new benq 1655 can burn with this quality!


#35

The record on 110 depends on temperature of drive. The low temperature is better.


#36

That would count for ANY and EVERY drive, regardless if it’s optical or a hdd.

Normally there should be FANS installed.


#37

My post above should read: “the benq 1655 can’t burn with this quality”


#38

Why I cant use the “Disc Quality” fonction with my 110 and my 107D ? (Nero 6.6.0.18). The start button is not available.

Tx


#39

Its not available for pioneer drives as well as a bunch of others manuf.

There is a simple registry hack that allows it to work, you simply have to remove “pioneer” from the restricted drives list.


#40

It works, tx !