If the picture-recording-quality is like this, there can be only one conclusion: DonÂ´t buy it
I just posted the article Lite-On LVW-1105HC+ Review - Standalone DVD Recorder.
Since our last review of the LVW-5045, Lite-On has come out with several slim-line models, which are no larger than the average bathroom scale! This review covers the LVW-1105HC+, which features DVD+R/RW and DVD-R/RW recording support and we will take a good look at its usability, features and picture quality, not to mention its write quality like with our IDE optical drive reviews.
Read the full article here: [http://www.cdfreaks.com/review/128-Lite-On-LVW-1105HC-Review---Standalone-DVD-Recorder/](http://www.cdfreaks.com/review/128-Lite-On-LVW-1105HC-Review---Standalone-DVD-Recorder/) Feel free to add your comments below. Please note that the reactions from the complete site will be synched below.
With faiure to write it’s own supplied +RW disc…don’t bother.:+
Hello! I donÂ´t understand the following text in this review about the Lite-On LVW-1105HC: http://www.cdfreaks.com/article/263/11 Positive: Excellent DVD+R, DVD-R and DVD-RW recording quality. Negative: Disappointing recorded picture quality with both HQ and SP modes. What do these words mean: recording quality and what does these words means: recorded picture quality or is the meaning of them the same? If both words have the same meaning, then there ist the decent recording quality. In the review stand this: Decent recording quality in its long play modes. Allthough, isnÂ´t that Long Play Modus is always not so good as short play or HQ modus? Why is the record quality from the long play modus in this Lite-On LVW-1105HC even better then the record quality in the HQ or SP modus? Friendly Greetings from Moe Perry