Any comments ?
That “test” doesn’t contain any interesting information
Would be better if he compared the 52x lite-on w/ other CDRWs like 48x lite-on and OCed 52x lite-on, 'cause the way he did it there’s no way readers know how much better the 52x is. I would check out what cdrlabs and crdinfo and improve on what they have and haven’t covered.
Hmmm… I wonder why those guys are so poor. They all have old systems for their hardware tests. 500 celery, 900 slot 1 Athlon.