Herrie 107b7 vs. 107b8 on Memorex x4 +RW - (Ricoh W11)
Fairly significant improvement with 107b8 vs. 107b7, using high-cycle,
Ricoh x4 W11 +RW - (see Disks 5 and 6)
These +RWs have been used for recording TV news/shows, with at least
30 cycles on each.
Recorder: NEC 2500a - FW: 107b7
Media: Memorex x4 +RW (Ricoh W11) @ x4
RecordNow Max 4.5 - PX Engine 507
This +RW has at least 50cycles, quick-erased and burned with 2500a.
PI MAX: 21 - Average: 3.002
PO MAX: 6 - Average: 0.111
This +RW has at least 63cycles, quick-erased and burned with 2500a.
PI MAX: 44 - Average: 13.784
PO MAX: 11 - Average: 0.569
Disk 3 *
This +RW has at least 30cycles, quick-erased and burned with ULead MF2
PI MAX: 280 - Average: 14.534
PO MAX: 20 - Average: 0.906
Disk 4 *
Same disc as above, same data set, 2500 quick erased.
PI MAX: 26 - Average: 6.989
PO MAX: 8 - Average: 0.272
* - It appears the app burning engine may affect quality.
ULead MF 2 worked well with LiteOn, but may need burn engine update for 2500.
It may also be a marginal disc too... shrug
Disk 5 - (3.2gig)
Full erase with 2500, high-cycle +RW
PI MAX: 65 - Average: 17.073
PO MAX: 12 - Average: 0.828
Disk 6 - (3.2gig)
Installed 107b8 FW, quick-erase 2500, same as Disk 5, high-cycle +RW
PI MAX: 17 - Average: 2.031
PO MAX: 8 - Average: 0.114