No you cannot get points with the technology comments, so you switch to reputation topic. For what reason? We do not have any reputation here, Since the first days, since our first solution everybody wrote that we are scammers. There are different threads.
Now, at this point, everybody knows our software better than us. As I wrote, learn what Cinavia is, then look at our solution and you will recognize how it works. All the nonsens here are no proofs. What proof? “Hey there is a audio inside”
1.) The audio that DVD-Ranger generate with the reference inside the database has a poor quality.
2.) Everybody who has experience with Cinavia knows that you cannot mix parts together because Cinavia is in the whole bands.
3.) Try to put a DVD audio into a BD video. Try to make it Sync.
As I wrote all the time, the database contains a first pass. What is a first pass? It can be a control set, it can be a virtual fiunction, it can be a reference. What is a reference? A reference is a part where a complex algorythm will restore audio.
Sure, the function will work also on silence, because it has a reference. This is the sense to reduce the processing time and increase the success rate and reduce the errors.
So what I want, is to get a technical proof, that the poor audio they found can be reencoded to 5.1 Multichannel audio without Cinavia. Why noone brings this proof? Yes, it is not possible.
So all this people will publish their nonsens further. But until they do not start to learn Cinavia and audio processing they will run against walls. It is the same as people think they can beat Cinavia with Audacity in HD quality.
So give proofs…give technical facts.