@Upp3rd0G
Mit dir könnte ich mich eigentlich auch auf Deutsch unterhalten, deinen Grüßen nach zu urteilen, anstatt mir hier einen abzubrechen ;-))) Aber egal …
FIRST: Don’t expect too much 
Let’s start with a little test which only makes sense in theory …
I’ve tried this with the good old Terminator 2 Soundtrack, ORIGINAL, of course.
I read the disc with CloneCD, Audio-Subs enabled [UltraPlex 40max], CUE sheet enabled. After finished, the cue-sheet looks like this:
FILE “T2_OST.img” BINARY
TRACK 1 AUDIO
INDEX 1 00:00:00
TRACK 2 AUDIO
INDEX 0 01:56:58
INDEX 1 01:58:65
TRACK 3 AUDIO
INDEX 0 04:30:15
INDEX 1 04:33:53
TRACK 4 AUDIO
INDEX 1 09:08:55
TRACK 5 AUDIO
INDEX 0 12:34:18
INDEX 1 12:37:28
TRACK 6 AUDIO
INDEX 0 14:26:58
INDEX 1 14:29:00
TRACK 7 AUDIO
INDEX 0 18:35:58
INDEX 1 18:38:00
TRACK 8 AUDIO
INDEX 1 21:49:10
TRACK 9 AUDIO
INDEX 1 23:28:48
TRACK 10 AUDIO
INDEX 0 24:10:03
INDEX 1 24:12:53
TRACK 11 AUDIO
INDEX 0 27:35:28
INDEX 1 27:37:53
TRACK 12 AUDIO
INDEX 0 31:35:68
INDEX 1 31:38:30
TRACK 13 AUDIO
INDEX 1 34:06:18
TRACK 14 AUDIO
INDEX 1 35:50:10
TRACK 15 AUDIO
INDEX 1 38:53:53
TRACK 16 AUDIO
INDEX 1 40:20:70
TRACK 17 AUDIO
INDEX 1 43:00:20
TRACK 18 AUDIO
INDEX 1 45:06:33
TRACK 19 AUDIO
INDEX 1 47:22:13
TRACK 20 AUDIO
INDEX 0 49:03:18
INDEX 1 49:05:70
Then I read the same CD with EAC [Offset Correction +676 Samples, C2 error detection]. I detected the gaps with method A, accurate and generated an image (w/o header, of course) and a CUE-sheet:
FILE “C:\T2_EAC.raw” BINARY
TRACK 01 AUDIO
INDEX 01 00:00:00
TRACK 02 AUDIO
INDEX 00 01:56:58
INDEX 01 01:58:65
TRACK 03 AUDIO
INDEX 00 04:30:15
INDEX 01 04:33:53
TRACK 04 AUDIO
INDEX 01 09:08:55
TRACK 05 AUDIO
INDEX 00 12:34:18
INDEX 01 12:37:28
TRACK 06 AUDIO
INDEX 00 14:26:58
INDEX 01 14:29:00
TRACK 07 AUDIO
INDEX 00 18:35:58
INDEX 01 18:38:00
TRACK 08 AUDIO
INDEX 01 21:49:10
TRACK 09 AUDIO
INDEX 01 23:28:48
TRACK 10 AUDIO
INDEX 00 24:10:03
INDEX 01 24:12:53
TRACK 11 AUDIO
INDEX 00 27:35:27
INDEX 01 27:37:53
TRACK 12 AUDIO
INDEX 00 31:35:68
INDEX 01 31:38:30
TRACK 13 AUDIO
INDEX 01 34:06:18
TRACK 14 AUDIO
INDEX 01 35:50:10
TRACK 15 AUDIO
INDEX 01 38:53:53
TRACK 16 AUDIO
INDEX 01 40:20:70
TRACK 17 AUDIO
INDEX 01 43:00:20
TRACK 18 AUDIO
INDEX 01 45:06:33
TRACK 19 AUDIO
INDEX 01 47:22:13
TRACK 20 AUDIO
INDEX 00 49:03:18
INDEX 01 49:05:70
The two CUEs look the same except the entry INDEX 00 @ Track 11. A difference of 1 frame occurs. Don’t ask me why.
But one thing is clear: The Gap detection of CloneCD is (nearly) perfect because it uses the subcodes, while EAC tries another method which often gives COMPLETE wrong results, especially on scratched CDs. But back on topic…
I replaced the image from EAC with the CloneCDs one and recorded this onto CD-RW.
The copy will have the correct subcodes (inkl. all gaps, ISRC, etc.), BUT another write offset (at least on my burner PlexWriter PX-W1210S). Normally I have a write-offset of -30 samples but if I use CloneCD as described I get -1206 Samples. Maybe this is because of the subs … Olli, any idea ??? 
But if you correct this again while reading the copy, you end up with the same image without any generation loss. OK, I don’t know, how long the subs are reliable.
The same is possible for mixed-mode cds, too. You only need a good file splitter/merger …