Did 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' turn the 3D tide? Yes & no

[Justin_Massoud]

Did 'Transformers: Dark of the Moon' turn the 3D tide? Yes & no.

[newsimage]http://static.rankone.nl/images_posts/2011/07/GrkSUk.jpg[/newsimage]In the weeks leading up to the debut of the highly-anticipated third Transformers flick "Dark of the Moon," analysts, experts and Hollywood itself painted the Michael Bay blockbuster as a sort of last stand for 3D. Interest in the medium was already cited as declining, so many reasoned that without a stalwart success this summer the downward spiral would continue unabated. Was "Transformers 3" in 3D a success? Basically, yes. Did it renew interest in 3D films? Maybe.


Read the full article here: [http://www.myce.com/news/did-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-turn-the-3d-tide-yes-no-47969/](http://www.myce.com/news/did-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-turn-the-3d-tide-yes-no-47969/)


Please note that the reactions from the complete site will be synched below.

[SciFer]

Some movies deserve to be in 3D and some don’t; this one does.

[Dr_Who]

This was a great movie in 3D.

[Blu-rayFreak]

No, I don’t think it will turn the 3D tide. This movie is an exception. I actually do want to see it in 3D. Can’t think of any others that I’d want to, except maybe the upcoming “The Hobbit” movies.

[Zod]

I think the audiences can tell if you’re doing a 3d conversion in post production. The quality is subpar compared to moves filmed in 3rd (like avatar/transformers 3).

I think when people know the 3d quality will be decent, they’ll pay for it, but when the 3d is added post production, it seems like a cash grab, and people don’t buy it.

[samlar]

no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no no

did I say no