[QUOTE=Wombler;2552464]I’ve more than taken that into consideration and as a long time member I’m sure you appreciate the need for us to edit certain posts that may be misinterpreted by others.
I haven’t issued a warning, I haven’t deleted the thread, I’ve edited your post to remove any potential concerns and I’ve allowed the core of your query to remain.
If I’d considered it as deliberate spam I’d have taken further action but clearly that’s not the case.
I’m open to suggestions but I can’t really see how I could have been any fairer with this.
[B]Wombler[/B][/QUOTE]Not to seem argumentive, but isn’t this a discussion forum – a place where people freely share/discuss ideas and technologies? All I did was post a link to the product I was discussing to save readers from having to do a search for it to know what I was referring to. That’s considered spam?
Basically, you are stating that discussion about any other decrypting/converting app beside the ones this forum (and your sig) clearly endorse is forbidden. Glad that type of censorship isn’t practiced by the mods in the CDF forums I normally participate in or there would only be a couple disc brands and burner manufacturers allowed to be discussed…
At any rate – if you truly wish to be fair about things, then why not remove that smart-assed spam image posted by samlar? In fact why not just zap this whole thread so that evil competing product’s name will never be seen by another via the search feature?
Feel free to now ban or warn me if you like, and if you do it will be the final sign to me that this is no longer the same great forum its founders originally created, and not one I’ll be trusting anymore for reliable unbiased info.