Originally posted by Andareed
Starforce is not used as often as safedisc and securom. Therefore, most of the effort is put into these two protections. If starforce becomes really popular, there is a greater chance that it will be closely examined.
Well sorry that I say this (it's not personal), but I think that's just stupid.
With Alcohol120% and Blindwrite we now (at the moment) can copy every SD2.8, SD2.9 and SecuROM new protection.
So why don't "they" examin Starforce now??
Or TagÃ¨s for example! I heard that it's quit easy to defeat TagÃ¨s, so why don't they just put that into the programs. All the people who now have a game with Starforce or TagÃ¨s can't backup their CD's, because the protection isn't used that much.
IT IS USED!!
If any of these progs would/could defeat StarForce or TagÃ¨s then they "force" the other to implement that feature also.
Isn't that what we all want: a program that could defeat all protections (even if they aren't used tha much).
If I had the knowledge I would write such a program myself, but I don't have it (now).
What I want to say is: I don't think that the argument "that protection is't used much" is a reason not to investigate it.