Allright, Steven, thank you very much!
It seems the 110 scans just as the 109, which means... not that good. :rolleyes:
Same strange behaviour (compression of PI levels, frantic reactions to a local problem, erratic PO levels..)
Too bad... well, at least, it doesn't seem to be WORSE than the 109 :bigsmile:
People may still compare different media with the 109 and/or the 110, but impossible to judge of the "absolute" quality of a disc... only relative to another disc...
Oh, well. I won't replace my 109 with a 110 then.