Post your BenQ DW1620 media here

Not that good batch of Taiyo Yudens T02 (TG001133), Fujifilm branded (MIJ).
DVD Decrypter, burntime 6:14.
.

Same media, but with NVidia IDE drivers installed, a better burn.

Better ? Well, at least the sampling count is 25% lower, which will reduce the number of total errors of course. Either the NVidea driver is slower or there was an additional load on your pc.

RICOHJPNW11 4x DVD+RW burned @4x
BenQ DW1620 FW B7U9. Media sold as Sony (Made in Taiwan).

Compare to 1620 FW B7T9, here.

My best overall burn..my last teon 8x dvd+r MCC003...disc right before this one was a coaster..could not even scan it

even only the early peak was a 3..I could enter HOF...I am going to rescan and see.....

Sometimes even my Benq can be

Here is a scan of Ritek ink jet printable R03-02. Burn speed 12x, Burn time 6:49. Best scan so far for this media.
Edited typo

Fujifilm TY +R 8x @ 12x

Completed Media Test as of March 25, 2005.
BenQ DW1620A FW B7U9 (dig-in to get B7T9 and B7P9).

DVD+R
MCC004 (Verbatim) DVD+R 16x
Burned @16x: link, 5:21 mins, QS=94%, mPIE=7, mPIF=11

YUDEN000-T02 (Fujifilm, TDK, Sony) DVD+R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 5:49 mins, QS=97%, mPIE=9, mPIF=5
Burned @16x: link1, 5:20 mins, QS=94%, mPIE=9, mPIF=11
Burned @16x: link2, 5:20 mins, QS=95%, mPIE=14, mPIF=8
Burned @16x: link3, 5:28 mins, QS=95%, mPIE=15, mPIF=9

RICOHJPNR02 (TDK) DVD+R 8x
Burned @16x: link, 5:23 mins, QS=95%, mPIE=132, mPIF=9
Burned @16x: link, 6:01 mins, QS=94%, mPIE=74, mPIF=10

MCC003 (Verbatim) DVD+R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 5:53 mins, QS=96%, mPIE=8, mPIF=7

MAXELL002 (Maxell) DVD+R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 5:49 mins, QS=97%, mPIE=14, mPIF=6

MBIPG101R04 (Staples) DVD+R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 5:49 mins, QS=97%, mPIE=6, mPIF=5

CMC MAG E01 (Teon) DVD+R 8x
Burned @8x: link, 7:43 mins, QS=94%, mPIE=11, mPIF=10

DVD-R
MCC03RG20 (Verbatim) DVD-R 16x
Burned @16x: link, 5:33 mins, QS=95%, mPIE=96, mPIF=8

TYG02 (Fujifilm) DVD-R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 6:20 mins, QS=96%, mPIE=49, mPIF=7
Burned @16x: link, 5:33 mins, QS=99%, mPIE=11, mPIF=3
Burned @16x: link, 5:33 mins, QS=99%, mPIE=12, mPIF=3

SONY08D1 (Sony) DVD-R 8x
Burned @16x: link, 5:47 mins, QS=91%, mPIE=189, mPIF=15

MCC02RG20 (Verbatim) DVD-R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 6:40 mins, QS=94%, mPIE=112, mPIF=11

PRODISCF01 (Fujifilm) DVD-R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 6:18 mins, QS=96%, mPIE=69, mPIF=7

MXL RG03 (Maxell) DVD-R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 6:37 mins, QS=95%, mPIE=53, mPIF=8

CMC MAG AE1 (Teon) DVD-R 8x
Burned @12x: link, 6:13 mins, QS=97%, mPIE=57, mPIF=6

FUJIFILM03 (Memorex) DVD-R 8x
Burned @8x: link, 7:49 mins, QS=45%, mPIE=759, mPIF=37

TTG02 (TDK) DVD-R 8x
Burned @8x: link, 7:51 mins, QS=97%, mPIE=8, mPIF=6

DVD+RW
RICOHJPNW11 (Sony) DVD+RW 4x
Burned @4x: link, 14:27 mins, QS=92%, mPIE=34, mPIF=14

Hi, I have just bought my DW1620 and this is my first burn scan.

I saw most of your scan get PO failure=0 but mine is having nearly 10k, is this a sign of bad burn? Does it means I would be having problem reading the content of the DVD later on?

Please give me some feedback.
Thanks.

p/s: this media is a cheap 4X media, have the price of my another Ricoh media. I have yet to try out my Ricoh 8X media.

cd-speed should give a quality score of 0! if there is any POF!

I don´t know why you get not a O, because POF meens coaster.

Try a diffenrent media.

Welcome to cdfreaks [J]
Media you are using right now is not that good. I can ensure you RICOH media will give you much better result.

He is not the only one to achieve this...

Anyone ever seen 10 times more POF´s than PIE´s?
Don't blame it on drive or media, blame it on me. Disabling WOPC with this media is suicide.
.

---

Last edited by pinto2; 25-03-2005 at 12:01. Reason: re.

I see it´s my mistake

When do you get a quality score of 0?

Sorry, no mistake from your side...

More exactly, my meaning was; I also can make a super-coaster without landing at 0 QS.

BTW corsan, have you burned any RICOH media yet?

POF = 0 score is also my experience. The only exception comes when the POF is read from the non-written region, caused by not ejecting the disc after burning.

@pinto2:

yes i burnt several ricohjpn r02 (platinum label) with a qualityscore at 97 and above with fw B7T9 Ciao

ok...I am new here and trying to run some tests....Below is a MCC 01RG20 disc (4x)(Prodisc from Supermediastore) written at 8x using T9(02RG20 strategy) ..Can you tell me what the large dips are?? Did the scan come out ok?? Is a time of 8:47 semi respectable for an 8X burn??

And here is a +RW burnt with DW1620(T9) @ 2.4X

all scans are great; the large dips are caused by the wopc technic used in benq and philips dvd burners. It´s normal

ahhh..the WOPC I have heard about...I assume turning this off would increase my speed..(and decrease my reliability).....but if your going for speed, most people have this off?? i saw a couple of 8x scans in the mid 7's..Is that due to +r media?? actaul 8X media?? or WOPC being disabled??

I also checked Pinto2's page on Burst and WOPC..Looks like I am currently screwed as I have 60 pcs of MCC_O1RG20 media (-R@4x) which I can only "overclock" using B7T9......but WOPC disable is only available on B7U9..Oh well..Guess I will take the mid 8 min burns until I get some new media...

thx
bama

---

Last edited by Southpaw; 26-03-2005 at 14:34.

I think that's a wise decision right now Southpaw...

Back on topic
MID: RICOHJPN R01-002
Brand: Fujifilm, juwelcase
Type: DVD+R 4x rated
Burned as: DVD Decrypter (movie image)
Burned at: 8x speed
Burntime: 8:21
Firmware: B7T9
.

mine turn now guys...all sit back....WOPC on

5:48

Post edited

Sorry elee, seems I was mistaken, lol

Woow, top speed of 16.19x...

Pinto2

yup....we should see who can hit a top speed hur??..

RicohJPN 8X burnt at 8X

Hello,

Here are two of my burns of Fuji 4x branded RicohJPN R01 media burned at 8x on my 1620 in an external 1394 enclosure. The 1620 loves this media. The top scan was burned using the ISO+Joilet filesystem, and the bottom scan uses UDF 1.50.

-TedS