| | #1 |
| MyCE Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Europe
Posts: 358
| MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) I am getting not as good scan results of MCC 004 (Made in Taiwan) media when burned with BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) at 16x and 12x. Burning at 8x seems to produce better scans. Is this a burner/firmware issue? |
| | |
| | |
| Register to remove me Join Date: Today Location: Myce HQ
Posts: Zillions
| |
| | #2 |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,140
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Have you tried readin this thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=182109 I know it is for the 1655, but essentially they are the same drive. If you are using the latest then it might be an idea to go back on version.
__________________ "I'm only happy when it rains, I feel good when things are going wrong, I only listen to the sad, sad songs, I'm only happy when it rains" (Garbage-"I'm Only Happy When It Rains") |
| | |
| | #4 |
| CD Freaks Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Venus
Posts: 268
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) @Zebadee: Mmmh. When it works. Never worked for me - I'm happy with BCDC and BCFC. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,269
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
I have a flashing ritual that works for me. A lot of folk think of it as being a load of ****. But my scans are up there with the best & more importantly consistant too. That said I too would suggest that BCFC is a better option. Ironic that BenQ have yet to list this on more than the one site. Despite some units being sold over the counter with BCFC installed. | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 75
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
Thank you, Al | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 75
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) And one more question. In looking for the drives serial # for my MIR, I found something interesting. On the drive label, it has BENQ model DW1650, and in the lower right it has the following- 1. DVD/CD Rewritable Drive Unit 2. BQR-DW1655(B) and so on. And on the Nero disk, LightScribe v1.4.44.1. Finally, the question is- Can I do lightscribe with this drive? Al |
| | |
| | #8 |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: Western Australia
Posts: 103
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) MCC 004 & BCHC are working well for me at 12x. I can't comment on 16x as the drive is in an external enclosure. SB is on for known media and WOPC is also on. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| MyCE Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 421
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
Please tell me your flashing ritual. Short of sacrifacing my dog on a homemade alter - tell me what needs to be done | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,269
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Hi ![]() @ Big_A Firstly f/w can be got here. A rpc1 version from tdb. @ et al This ritual is simply that of using the earliest f/w available in .cvt file format & flashing drive. Then flashing to latest/desired f/w, again with a .cvt file. Then going on third time lucky a final flash using .exe format (this can be official or rpc1/MCSE/both patched.SafeMode can be used but not essential. In cases where a problem appears with a drive or f/w,(& this is not a recommendation) crossflashing to Philips then back to BenQ make up the first 2 stages. But remember that this Voids your Warranty. SafeMode is advisable here & in the extreme flashing in DOS. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| MyCE Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 421
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) for my 1650, I dont even know how this would be possible. Since you have a 1650, how would you recommend I go about doing this?? All I see are .exe and starting with BCFC too - no .cvt file! |
| | |
| | #12 |
| MyCE Resident Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Jouy-le-Moutier, Fr
Posts: 1,476
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) That's why I kept BCFC!!! Look this scan
__________________ Philips 1648p1 /\ BenQ 1650 \/ Samsung SH-S203B /\ Samsung SH-S223Q ![]() Vista Pro 64 /\ Phenom BE 9850 \/ ASUS M3A32-MVP deluxe WIFI /\ 4 go Gskill HZ 6400\/ Sapphire HD4890 1G0 Get your BEST Silicon Image 0680 bios for your addon cards HERE |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Alpha Quadrant, Sol system; WA State
Posts: 138
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
i surely would like to know the *reasoning* behind it b/c it appears more like some sort of "superstition" *lol*. do you think that using a CVT file would overwrite a flash area that might not be affected by an EXE version (or vice versa)?i mean, after all, it's just about a flash chip being reprogrammed, right? CKA ps: i'm not questioning your "sanity" -- but i'm a "scientific" person *lol* | |
| | |
| | #14 | ||
| DVD Freak Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Nordic Region
Posts: 7,647
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) [off topic]. Quote:
Quote:
There are good reasons to questioning this "ritual"... I thought, it's already known that there is no difference between the data sent to drive either if you use a flasher and .cvt firmware or the stock .exe flasher. The data sent to drives memory is the same bit by bit. Thus resulting in drive being basically flashed with a .cvt file. The only difference I have seen are a more relaxed timings in validating memory data chanks sent to drive when using .exe flasher/firmware. Now maybe some of you say; prove it. Sure, everybody can check/prove this out, simply by running TraceSPTI while flashing .exe firmware respectively flashing drive with .cvt firmware. Just add "WinDWFlash" and "CmdFlash" (without quotes) to SptiHook.ini. For further details check out the TraceSPTI guide in my sig (to which zebadee contributed). Now everybody can draw their own conclusion about the "ritual"... And the many time raised and linked "better or improved" burns when reflashing drive several times are most probably only related to drive quality, good compu setup and high quality media used. Until somebody proves otherwise, I'm confident in my findings. Last edited by pinto2; 05-06-2006 at 13:05. Reason: added SptiHook.ini info | ||
| | |
| | #15 |
| MyCE Resident Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Lost in America
Posts: 7,123
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Remember guys, there are three versions of MCC 004 in the US, two from Prodisc and one from CMC. I have found the CMC is much better on all my drives, BenQ 1655 included, at 12X. You might try locating that version. The serial starts with PAPA and the case has a taller non-tapering center hub. This pic is for CDR but shows the case I am referring to. |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,178
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
, now there's even versions of the same disc from one manufacturer. 4 types of MCC004 with the normal batch variations to deal with aswell, lol | |
| | |
| | #17 | |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Alpha Quadrant, Sol system; WA State
Posts: 138
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
also, verbatim advertises proudly with their good 16x compatibility AND their MCC004 ID (i think i saw it on their website somewhere, but not sure anymore)... the 16x verbatims i have bought so far all carried "MCC004", but i still haven't opened 600 discs -- all "made in taiwan"... ~300 have all burned very consistently with great quality (usually @ 12x, just to be on the safe side) with my BenQ 1640. no coasters! CKA | |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,178
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
So your 'Made in Taiwan' discs maybe either Prodisc or CMC manufactured. You have to check the serial numbers to be able to identify who manufactured the discs. chas0039 will have to explain how to tell the difference between the 2 Prodisc versions he talks about. | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| MyCE Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Europe
Posts: 358
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) The MCC 004 media 'Made in Taiwan' tested by me were made by CMC (serial starts with PAPA). These discs seem to burn better at 8x using my Benq DW1650 and firmware BCHC. I am also going to try burning at 4x and see if the results are better or worse. |
| | |
| | #20 | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,178
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| CD Freaks Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: Alpha Quadrant, Sol system; WA State
Posts: 138
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
. but why then are prodisc blanks not up to "verbatim's" quality level as several scans in the forum show???TL0: dude, don't scare me with the thought that verbatim might outsource to ritek *yuck* *LOL*. CKA | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| CD Freaks Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: usa
Posts: 87
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
Jonn | |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| CD Freaks Rookie Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 35
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 | |
| CDFreaks Resident Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,178
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Quote:
My preferred tool for the task. | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| MyCE Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Europe
Posts: 358
| Re: MCC 004 & BENQ DW1650 (BCHC) Burned at 4x with Solid Burn activated and WOPC enabled. To me this seems much better than burns at 8x, 12x or 16x. Anyone disagrees? |
| | |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DW1650, Solidburn & MCC 004 Problem | keyap | BenQ / Philips Writer | 4 | 10-01-2007 00:31 |
| Big problems with DW-1650 and dw1650 and MCC-004-00 | morphen | BenQ / Philips Writer | 14 | 29-12-2006 08:49 |
| MCC 004 and Benq 1640 | minaelromany | BenQ / Philips Writer | 5 | 09-06-2006 15:10 |
| Problem burning Verbatim MCC 004 with BenQ DW1655 BCHB (Verbatim MMC 004 crap?) | Phat_cow | BenQ / Philips Writer | 16 | 04-06-2006 23:32 |
| New Firmware BenQ DW1650 BCHC support and discussion thread | zevia | BenQ / Philips Writer | 115 | 29-05-2006 21:17 |