The best burn I have seen so far!!!
| BenQ / Philips Writer Discuss, The best burn I have seen so far!!! at CD and DVD Writers forum; BenQ DW1620 B7T9 and MCC 003 (Verbatim DVD+R 8X) written at 12X and scanned at 8X! Total of 24 PIF all over the disc! Maximum of 2! WOW! Total of 27290 PIE isn't so impressive, but average of 2,95 By the way, it seems impropable to me, but does the |
Posted: 06-01-2005 - #1
| BenQ DW1620 B7T9 and MCC 003 (Verbatim DVD+R 8X) written at 12X and scanned at 8X! Total of 24 PIF all over the disc! Maximum of 2! WOW!  Total of 27290 PIE isn't so impressive, but average of 2,95  By the way, it seems impropable to me, but does the software used for burning affect the PIE/PIF errors? This one was burned using DVD Decrypter ISO mode. I have never achieved this quality with Nero nor Alcohol... |
- Today (MyCE Staff)
- Posts: 15,596
| |
Posted: 06-01-2005 - #3
| Same media, 4X and 16X scan. When the scanning speed reaches 14X, the PIE errors obviously have nothing to do with the media. But I wonder why BenQ DW1620 reads DVD±R/RW media at 8X only, when it can scan it at 16X with acceptable quality/performace? I think it could easily read those at 16X... or at least 8X Z-CLV, but definately not 8X CAV... And notice the speed at the end... 16,25X! |
Posted: 07-01-2005 - #4
| Yeah, recording software can affect the quality of the burn. I suppose that adding a great amount of RAM to a fast computer system could cover most software differences. However, on most systems, the software buffer behaves differently according to system load, available ram, and the writer of the software.  On my system, Nero burns poorly with choppy video playback. DVDDecryptor does a very good job, and RecordNow gets even higher quality (with much more speed). I'm just comparing ISO writing there. Oh, and I removed all VSO and VSO based (computer-killing Patton Couffin Driver #&#$!!!) software from my system because the recording method in use tended to jam up my set-top player. |
Posted: 07-01-2005 - #5
| keep looking around you will find better scans  |
Posted: 07-01-2005 - #6
| Beautiful burn, especially considering that the 4x, 8x AND 16x scan all see this burn as 99%. Now, if only it were a 16x burn! |
There's more to MyCE.com
Listen up, we've got more. Product information on 107,830 products. Our experts have written 540 articles. We've gathered 16,487 news items for you to always keep updated.