Pioneer DVR-112: Post your scans and questions here
| Asus / Pioneer Writer Discuss, Pioneer DVR-112: Post your scans and questions here at CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers forum; MCC004 (Verbatim) MIT Burn speed 18x Firmware 1.09 Excellent burn. Attached Images PIONEER_DVD-RW__DVR-112_1.09_02-March-2007_20_18 MCC004 18x write.png (41.7 KB, 1663 views) Optiarc_DVD_RW_AD-7173A_1-01_02-March-2007_21_56 MCC004 read.png (35.4 KB, 1634 views) MCC004 KProbe.PNG (10.9 KB, 1656 views) __________________ We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us My Review PC & |
-
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 1
MCC004 (Verbatim) MIT
Burn speed 18x
Firmware 1.09
Excellent burn.
__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page
Last edited by Dee; 04-03-2007 at 00:35.
- Today (MyCE Staff)
- Posts: 15,596
-
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 2
MCC03RG20 (Verbatim)MIT
Burn speed 18x
Firmware 1.09
Another excellent burn.__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page
Last edited by Dee; 04-03-2007 at 00:35. -
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 3
How bout some DL media? I am really disappointed with the 112 so far. I have been unsuccessful flashing to anything other than the official FW.
Here's a couple scans of MKM001.
One a 4X and one @ 8X. Both were excellent burns until the very end when they took a crap.
http://club.cdfreaks.com/attachment....d=103187&stc=1
http://club.cdfreaks.com/attachment....d=103188&stc=1 -
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 4
MKM003 +R DL (Verbatim)MIS
Burn speed 10x
Firmware 1.09
Once again excellent.__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page
Last edited by Dee; 04-03-2007 at 00:35. -
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 5
Do you think it's the media? I used MKM001. Which version of 1.09 did you use?Quote:Originally Posted by Dee-27MKM003 +R DL (Verbatim)
Burn speed 10x
Firmware 1.09
Once again excellent. -
Posted:
03-03-2007
- # 6
Is that ok to post 112D/L scans here too? Or, only 112 scans are allowed... __________________
Pioneer DVR-111L 8.29, Pioneer DVR-112D@112L 8.09, Pioneer DVR-112D@A12L 1.15
Samsung SH-S182M SB02
BenQ DW1655 x2 BCDB speedpatched/BCIB
LG H55N 1.00, LG H42N RJ11 Speedpatched, LG H22N 1.01, LG H22L 1.00
Lite-On SH-16A7S SATA WS04 FB-EOS, Lite-On LH-18A1P@BenQ DW1800 ZB35 FB , Lite-On LH-20A1H LL0A FB-EOS
TOSHIBA DVD/HDX807616 MC08
-
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 7
@Mirage Man
I'll burn a MKM001 later and post the results.
The firmware is original 112 (1.09) firmware supplied by Pioneer.
@0301orih
Sen has a thread for 112D running already.
I would prefer this thread was for 112 scans only
__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page -
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 8
@Dee-27
Thanks for the reply.
I guess you are talking about the "Pioneer 112D first look" thread. I have been posting my scans in that thread even though the title of the thread doesn't say "Pioneer DVR-112D/L: Post your scans and questions here".
I just wanted to make sure. Thanks again.
__________________
Pioneer DVR-111L 8.29, Pioneer DVR-112D@112L 8.09, Pioneer DVR-112D@A12L 1.15
Samsung SH-S182M SB02
BenQ DW1655 x2 BCDB speedpatched/BCIB
LG H55N 1.00, LG H42N RJ11 Speedpatched, LG H22N 1.01, LG H22L 1.00
Lite-On SH-16A7S SATA WS04 FB-EOS, Lite-On LH-18A1P@BenQ DW1800 ZB35 FB , Lite-On LH-20A1H LL0A FB-EOS
TOSHIBA DVD/HDX807616 MC08
-
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 9
Dee-27, I don't know if you have seen my thread in the media section yet. But I believe cd freaks need to start using jitter in their reviews when testing media.
I see you have posted 4x scans in K-probe, I don't think this is a good representation of how good a media is. 4x will always have an easier time reading a disc with higher jitter than 16x scanning will. With higher speed scanning, discs with high jitter tend to show massive increases in error levels. The jitter levels are important as I've had discs scan as good as yours yet skip like crazy in my dvd player. When scanning the jitter I saw jitter levels rise above 9.5% and even above 10%. I'd say a disc with 9% or higher jitter is not going to be as compatible as one that has less than 9% throughout the disc.
Here's my thread, let me know what you think: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=210304__________________
Best DVD media:
Verbatim MCC002 4x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC02RG20 8x DVD-R
DATASTREAM BRANDED CMC MAG E01 8x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC04 & MCC03RG20 16x DVD +-R
Ritek G05 media =
My writers: BenQ 1620 (thanks to terminalvelocd!), BenQ DW1800 x 2, LG 4167B, LG H22N, Pioneer 106D, Pioneer 109, Pioneer 111L.
-
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 10
Well my burns are from a 112D bought from Newegg. I wasn't aware there was a 112.Quote:Originally Posted by Dee-27@Mirage Man
I'll burn a MKM001 later and post the results.
The firmware is original 112 (1.09) firmware supplied by Pioneer.
@0301orih
Sen has a thread for 112D running already.
I would prefer this thread was for 112 scans only
-
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 11
Yes, i have read the thread.Quote:Originally Posted by cd pirateDee-27, I don't know if you have seen my thread in the media section yet. But I believe cd freaks need to start using jitter in their reviews when testing media.
Our testing methods are continually reviewed by the review team. But we do not make changes to our tests lightly, or without considering the impact of introducing new tests. We also have to consider consistency with older reviews.
I don't agree.Quote:Originally Posted by cd pirateI see you have posted 4x scans in K-probe, I don't think this is a good representation of how good a media is.
__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page -
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 12
MKM001 DVD+R DL (Verbatim) MIS
Burn speed 8x
Firmware 1.09
PIF clusters at the layer break. 8x probably just to fast for this media.
Still a good burn.__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page
Last edited by Dee; 04-03-2007 at 22:36. -
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 13
Righteo. Have fun calling potentially crap media, "good" or even "excellent". I'll be sticking to CDRInfo for drive and media reviews and their far more professional methods.
__________________
Best DVD media:
Verbatim MCC002 4x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC02RG20 8x DVD-R
DATASTREAM BRANDED CMC MAG E01 8x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC04 & MCC03RG20 16x DVD +-R
Ritek G05 media =
My writers: BenQ 1620 (thanks to terminalvelocd!), BenQ DW1800 x 2, LG 4167B, LG H22N, Pioneer 106D, Pioneer 109, Pioneer 111L.
-
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 14
Dee: What about some jitter scans, or scans at high speeds?
__________________
I'm a 太陽誘電の記録メディア fanboy. Stick to it and you most likely won't have any trouble (with degradation or compatibility and write errors).
Preferred media codes: CD-R 97m24s01f; CD-RW 97m34s24f; DVD+R YUDEN000 T03; DVD-R TYG03; DVD+RW MKM A03; DVD-RW MKM 01RW6X; DVD+R DL MKM 003; DVD-R DL I avoid that format
My collection:
Samsung SE-S224Q TS02, Plextor PX-712UF 1.04 (TLA #0104), Plextor PX-708UF2 1.02 (TLA #0102), Optiarc AD-7200A 1.06, Plextor PX-716UF 1.07 (TLA #0307), Lite-On LH-18A1H HL05, Philips JackRabbit JR32RWDVK P1.3, Philips JackRabbit JR24CDRW 1.01, LG GH22NP20 2.00, Matshita UJ-898 HC10, Lite-On LH-20A1H LL0D, Plextor PX-716UF 1.11 (TLA #0204), LG GSA-H22N 1.00, Plextor PX-716A 1.09 (TLA #0309)
+ Plextor PX-716A 1.09 (TLA #0309), BenQ DW1655 BCDB, Samsung TS-L632B TM31, Lite-On LTR-16101B TS0W
Lite-On SHM-165P6SU MS0P (mechanical failure), Plextor PX-708UF2 ?.?? (TLA #0102) (DVD optical part died), LG GSA-H10N @ H12N UJ12 (broken tray), BenQ DW1650 BCIC (sold), Lite-On SHW-16H5S @ 1635S YS0Z (lost in a fire), LG GCE-8527B 1.04 (optical part died), Samsung TS-L632H SC04 (sold), Canon Pixma iP4300 (printer head broken) -
Posted:
04-03-2007
- # 15
If you say so, it must be true.Quote:Originally Posted by cd pirateI'll be sticking to CDRInfo for drive and media reviews and their far more professional methods.


.__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page -
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 17
The transfer rate test is flawless. More important than the scan... you should at least recognize Dee's long-time merit in this field, as she's among those who never consider just the scan, but put emphasis on the TRT as the most important of the two tests. She taught me a lot during my participation in the NEC forum, and believe me, you'd be surprised at what she could still teach us. In other words, she certainly deserves some respect from us...Quote:Originally Posted by cd pirateRighteo. Have fun calling potentially crap media, "good" or even "excellent".Professional methods? Maybe (I'd rather say "professional equipement",) but very unprofessional interpretations. They are still able to declare as "good" a disc showing a problematic transfer rate test.Quote:I'll be sticking to CDRInfo for drive and media reviews and their far more professional methods.
Aren't you being confrontational for the pleasure of it here?
__________________
François "Wizzu" Marchand, the artist formerly known as Francksoy
I won't reply to technical help requests by PM, but ask you question in the forum and notify me, I'll be glad to help if I can! -
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 18
Well, Franck. I sort of come across as being a bit confrontational now and then but I seriously don't mean to be. It's hard to criticize something online and still come across as being friendly whereas I find it much easier to do in real life. 
I do know she uses TRT and it is flawless. However I've found that many of my discs that have showed playback issues have good error levels @4x without jitter and TRT fine on all my drives. Only the jitter is out of spec on these burns and it when I re-burn the file with a speed/writer that has lower jitter, the skipping problems go away.
I wonder, if the makers of Kprobe included jitter testing, would the reviewers use it?__________________
Best DVD media:
Verbatim MCC002 4x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC02RG20 8x DVD-R
DATASTREAM BRANDED CMC MAG E01 8x DVD+R
Verbatim MCC04 & MCC03RG20 16x DVD +-R
Ritek G05 media =
My writers: BenQ 1620 (thanks to terminalvelocd!), BenQ DW1800 x 2, LG 4167B, LG H22N, Pioneer 106D, Pioneer 109, Pioneer 111L.
-
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 19
TRT can be just as subjective as any other consumer drive test and some drives I would value their TRT results less. Good TRT can sometimes only be useful to determine that the drive which performed it can read the media, so it can be rather misleading itself (and even on that drive, it can be speed dependant).Quote:Originally Posted by FrancksoyThe transfer rate test is flawless. More important than the scan... you should at least recognize Dee's long-time merit in this field, as she's among those who never consider just the scan, but put emphasis on the TRT as the most important of the two tests. -
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 20
You are right, but in the case above, I think some requirements are met to put at least some trust in the TRT as an indication that the disc is fully usable: The 7173 is not among the best readers, the TRT is @12X with a DL disc... You're aware that many existing drives don't even read DL that fast, aren't you?Quote:Originally Posted by TL0TRT can be just as subjective as any other consumer drive test and some drives I would value their TRT results less. Good TRT can sometimes only be useful to determine that the drive which performed it can read the media, so it can be rather misleading itself (and even on that drive, it can be speed dependant).
__________________
François "Wizzu" Marchand, the artist formerly known as Francksoy
I won't reply to technical help requests by PM, but ask you question in the forum and notify me, I'll be glad to help if I can! -
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 21
YUDEN000T02 (Verbatim)
Burn speed 12x
Firmware 1.09
The result speaks for itself.__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page -
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 22
-
Posted:
05-03-2007
- # 23
TA Jitter test from the above T02 __________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page -
Posted:
06-03-2007
- # 24
How does this drive do on CD-Rs? Also, does Pioneer still have problems with RW media? -
Posted:
06-03-2007
- # 25
I haven't tried any RW media yet. CD-R is good.Quote:Originally Posted by GooberslotHow does this drive do on CD-Rs? Also, does Pioneer still have problems with RW media?__________________
We came to wreck everything and ruin your lives, God sent us
My Review PC & Optical Drives
To become a member of MyCE.com just click here to join
The Forum Rules | The SSD FAQ | The NEC/Optiarc F.A.Q. | Liggy & Dee's NEC/Optiarc Firmware Page
Similar Threads
- Results & Discussion: Pioneer DVR-112D/L: Post your scans and questions here
People who found this also searched for
- gh22ns40 cd-r scan
- 112l firmware scans
- 20a1p.kl0p.patched-eoht
- 20a4p 18a1p
- a12j 1.09
- advantages of updating 112 to 8.06
- asus 24b3st
- asus drw-24b3lt nero discspeed -acquista -prezzo
- asus drw-24b3st
- cd-dvd speed ritekg05 4x测试
- cdfreaks.com
- cdmwp02-082
- cpdr47g
- cpdr47g cdmwp02 114 dual layer?
- cpdr47g cdmwp02 dual layer?
- cpdr47g-cdmwp02
- cpdr47g-cdmwp02-082
- dangerous brothers 24b3st
- dh20a3l ev6d
- dru-840a rpc1
- drw-24b3st
- drw-24b3st burning 4x
- drw-24b3st quality scan consistency
- dvd-112bk
- dvr 112bkl labelflash
- dvr 116d mkm 001 best burn speed quality
- dvr 404 hl
- dvr-112 poor mkm003
- dvr-112e tweak

