Old 07-03-2008   #1
MyCE Member
zshan000's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: lahore(pakistan)
Posts: 189
Intel E8500 VS Q6600

hi guys
i am just confused today . i want to buy new processor . i have only two choices depending on my budget . the prices of below processors are same but i dunt know which one will be faster or better ...... if anybody has experienced tany of these processors then i loved to hear their comments

E8500 3.16Ghz (6MB CACHE - 1333MHZ FSB) VS
Q6600 2.40Ghz (8MB CACHE - 1066 MHZ FSB)

..............:cla p:
zshan000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2008   #2
MyCE Resident
TM's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Germany
Posts: 583
Re: Intel E8500 VS Q6600

Originally Posted by zshan000 View Post

E8500 3.16Ghz (6MB CACHE - 1333MHZ FSB) VS
Q6600 2.40Ghz (8MB CACHE - 1066 MHZ FSB)
Unfortunately you did not wrote what you are doing with your PC. The choice depends on what you'll are doing at your PC.

Let me explain. Most applications does not really well support the multicore technology. Only if the application is designed for multicore technology you'll have a speed increase. Professional Applications like Photoshop or Premiere supports the multicore systems well. Maybe other video authoring systems too.
But finally normal office applications, Browers, eMail clients,... does not really support it. And I thin it is not necessary since this applications are mostly no "number crushers".
For this reason I'd recommend a E8500. You have a CPU with two cores and a higher clock. The Q6600 has a lower clock but two cores more. And if you do not have any applications that support this 4 cores, the remaining cores are ideling and you do not have any benefit with this two cores.
The E8500 CPU is also a newer design and with the 45um technology the power consuption should be lower compared to the E6xxx series. For me the Q6600 is outdated design. If you really need a QuadCore I'd wait a few month until the 45um QuadCores are on the market with fair prices. The new Quadcored also benefit from the new design and have also lower power consumption. The new 45us CPUs are basically not faster than the olfd 65um CPU. The little higher speed comes from the larger cache. The speed will only increase it the applications are compiled with support for SSE4. Currently there should not be so much applications supporting this...

If you'd ask me what to buy I'd get the E8500!
Still own a bunch of Plextor, NEC and Pioneer burner

But I alo have a SureFire LX2, Backup, E2L, U2, A2L-WH, .... and a few more
TM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2008   #3
MyCE Resident
eric93se's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,622
Re: Intel E8500 VS Q6600

I would have to agree, the q6600 is a great chip, but its 1.5 years old now. the newer chips are faster and more efficient. Get the e8400, e8500, or wait for a 45nm quad, like the Q9300 or the Q9450.

I'm very happy with my E2180 OC'd to 3.0GHz, towards the end of the year I'll get a Q9450 when there is a price drop.
eric93se is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Q6600 Operating temps ?????? bozoagain General Hardware Forum 71 04-04-2008 23:25
$275.00 shipped G0 stepping Q6600 @ ClubIt Exec Bargain Basement 6 09-08-2007 20:59
List of Intel CPU prices after July 22nd Q6600 $266 and faster than E6850 ghetocowboy Bargain Basement 75 27-07-2007 09:10
Intel Q6600 Quad core CPU and XFX 680i SLI combo for $499.99 jhtalisman Bargain Basement 21 03-07-2007 09:29
GIGABYTE GA-965P-S3 LGA 775 Intel P965 ATX Intel Motherboard - Retail $107 shipped ghetocowboy Bargain Basement 6 20-03-2007 23:01

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 09:10.