Go Back   Club Myce > Hardware > CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers > LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer


LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer Discuss, bought an ihbs212 today... (nero disc quality help) at CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers forum; I've only been able to find LTH blu-ray media so far in my state and online. I burnt a full disc of 700mb avi's as a test, at 4x, with a verbatim 6x disc. The read and write buffers went up and down a little bit, I have no idea


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 28-06-2012   #1
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
bought an ihbs212 today... (nero disc quality help)

I've only been able to find LTH blu-ray media so far in my state and online. I burnt a full disc of 700mb avi's as a test, at 4x, with a verbatim 6x disc. The read and write buffers went up and down a little bit, I have no idea why since the drive is connected to a sata 2 port, with a sata 2 cable, but anyway, here's my nero disc quality result:

Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


Looks pretty bad, doesn't it? I'm in the middle of doing a burnt disc inside of nero diskcheck. My quality result should be somewhat like that in the review for the ihbs112, shouldn't it?
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today
Register to remove me
 
 
Join Date: Today
Location: Myce HQ
Posts: Zillions
Old 28-06-2012   #2
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
This was using the create disc feature at 6x... terrible results, buffer kept dropping towards the end: http://i48.tinypic.com/2eds0so.png
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2012   #3
Moderator
 
deanwitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The 10th city outside the 2nd City, U.S.
Posts: 2,698
The 112 and 212 are very different drives with different chipsets. Results with those two drives will be different. Discspeed scans should not be compared to scans around this forum using Opti Drive Control, which is a newer program and handles Blu-ray better. Do not use Discspeed or ODC for Blu-ray burning. They are both very poor for this. Use Imgburn to burn your discs and quality scan them at 4x speed with ODC.

Scans of LTH media have commonly been not as good as good quality HTL BD-R's. Where are you located that you don't have access to anything but LTH?

Your buffer issues are almost certainly a result of Discspeed's poor burning ability.

You can use the info in this post to view your burn info graph using Imgburn for burning.
__________________
Currently installed for testing: Lite-on DH20A4P-04(9P54) + Sony Optiarc AD-7200A(1.Z3) x2 "You want WHAT? OK, I can do that". + AD-7200S(1Z2) + AD-5280-CB-PLUS(1.Z7) + BenQ DW1650(BCIC) + BenQ DW1640(BSLB) x2 + Lite-on iHAS324-08 A(BL1H) + Asus DRW-24B1LT@iHAS424(ZLC1) + Asus DRW-24B1ST@iHAS324(BL1H) + Plextor PX-760A(1.03) + LG BD-RE WH10LS30(1.00) + Lite-on iHES208(8LOC) + Sammy SH-BO83L(SB01) + Pioneer BDR206(1.05) + Lite-on iHBS112-29(CLOK) + Pioneer BDR-205(1.12) + LG WH12LS39(1.00) + Lite-on iHBS212@Plextor PX-LB950SA(1.02)

Last edited by deanwitty; 28-06-2012 at 18:07.
deanwitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today
Always the best offers
 
 
Join Date: Today
Location: Myce HQ
Posts: Zillions
Old 28-06-2012   #4
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanwitty View Post
Where are you located that you don't have access to anything but LTH?

Your buffer issues are almost certainly a result of Discspeed's poor burning ability.
Rural Australia. I've flashed the firmware for the drive and, using Nero, which has cut my LDC results in half. I've already burnt off several discs using Nero, would the quality difference with using imageburn be enough to justify reburning those discs?
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2012   #5
Moderator
 
deanwitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The 10th city outside the 2nd City, U.S.
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by hxclespaulplayer View Post
Rural Australia. I've flashed the firmware for the drive and, using Nero, which has cut my LDC results in half. I've already burnt off several discs using Nero, would the quality difference with using imageburn be enough to justify reburning those discs?
Recently talking to another member from your neighborhood about your limited choices over there. Its a shame. You may want to watch Ebay for a good price on HiDisc 4x BD-R's(INFOMER30, scans in the Infomedia BD-R thread) which have been burning really well in the 212. What did you pay for those LTH?

Glad to hear things are moving in the right direction for you . If a transfer rate test on those burns doesn't show any read-back slowdowns, they may be OK. Don't know how important the burned material is. Your call.

Imgburn has been the most reliable software for BD-R burning. Utilize the verify after burning function for higher confidence in a good burn. Take advantage of its ability to save a burn graph and remove the need for Discspeed burning.
__________________
Currently installed for testing: Lite-on DH20A4P-04(9P54) + Sony Optiarc AD-7200A(1.Z3) x2 "You want WHAT? OK, I can do that". + AD-7200S(1Z2) + AD-5280-CB-PLUS(1.Z7) + BenQ DW1650(BCIC) + BenQ DW1640(BSLB) x2 + Lite-on iHAS324-08 A(BL1H) + Asus DRW-24B1LT@iHAS424(ZLC1) + Asus DRW-24B1ST@iHAS324(BL1H) + Plextor PX-760A(1.03) + LG BD-RE WH10LS30(1.00) + Lite-on iHES208(8LOC) + Sammy SH-BO83L(SB01) + Pioneer BDR206(1.05) + Lite-on iHBS112-29(CLOK) + Pioneer BDR-205(1.12) + LG WH12LS39(1.00) + Lite-on iHBS212@Plextor PX-LB950SA(1.02)
deanwitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-06-2012   #6
Senior Moderator, Editor and Guru
 
geno888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Italy
Posts: 29,213
I don't know if is related, but you are scanning these discs at full speed. Usually (at least for DVD), liteon drives give reliable scans at 4.

I know that scanning a full disc at 4x can be a long wait, but is anyway a waste of time if the scan at full speed is unreliable
__________________
Click here or here to download latest version of CD-DVD Speed
Click here to read more about DMA
User guide for CD-DVD Speed: English version - Versione Italiana
User guide for ImgBurn in BUILD mode English version - Italian version

Please do not ask questions via PM. Post in the forum instead. Thanks
Per favore, non chiedete consigli o suggerimenti tramite PM. Usate invece il forum (che serve proprio per questo).
KTPHTT
geno888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2012   #7
MyCE Resident
 
_chef_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: @FX labs .de ...playing LLAMATRON :-]
Posts: 30,613
Burning a 6x rated at 4x, who told you that???
__________________
Enable DMA with micrAp$0ft Enable DMA free at your will busTRACE => Upper/Lower Filters Util
DevCon
***HOW TO ... Delete the Upper & Lower Filters!***

If you expect help then please use the powerful SEARCH. Try ThreatFire
I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring & HD DVD media. Please PM me if you can help me.

Vamos Tribbles! V-a-m-o-s!!
_chef_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-06-2012   #8
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanwitty View Post
The 112 and 212 are very different drives with different chipsets. Results with those two drives will be different. Discspeed scans should not be compared to scans around this forum using Opti Drive Control, which is a newer program and handles Blu-ray better. Do not use Discspeed or ODC for Blu-ray burning. They are both very poor for this. Use Imgburn to burn your discs and quality scan them at 4x speed with ODC.

Scans of LTH media have commonly been not as good as good quality HTL BD-R's. Where are you located that you don't have access to anything but LTH?

Your buffer issues are almost certainly a result of Discspeed's poor burning ability.

You can use the info in this post to view your burn info graph using Imgburn for burning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanwitty View Post
Recently talking to another member from your neighborhood about your limited choices over there. Its a shame. You may want to watch Ebay for a good price on HiDisc 4x BD-R's(INFOMER30, scans in the Infomedia BD-R thread) which have been burning really well in the 212. What did you pay for those LTH?

Glad to hear things are moving in the right direction for you . If a transfer rate test on those burns doesn't show any read-back slowdowns, they may be OK. Don't know how important the burned material is. Your call.

Imgburn has been the most reliable software for BD-R burning. Utilize the verify after burning function for higher confidence in a good burn. Take advantage of its ability to save a burn graph and remove the need for Discspeed burning.
The lth's cost $30 for 10-pack. My prior nero burns seem to be ok when it comes to transfer rate tests, however using imgburn hasn't solved my buffering problems. I have a compilation that I'm trying to burn which includes a folder with about 200 files making up a total of 6gb. Not only does the buffer (both read and device buffers) regularly dip to zero when burning this part of the disc, it also does so when burning a 6gb iso image! I don't have anything like antivirus or spyware scans set to run at a certain time, in fact I've found that it's best to turn off antivirus full stop when burning files (better results in optidrive control, at least that was the case a long time ago with dvd's). I have no idea what could be accessing the hard drive so much as to slow down the burn. This one cimpilation (tried burning it twice now) takes over 30 mins to burn at 4x, instead of the 21 or so when the buffer "behaves".
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-06-2012   #9
Moderator
 
deanwitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The 10th city outside the 2nd City, U.S.
Posts: 2,698
$3.00/ea. for a real BD-R's poor cousin is just ridiculous. You may want to consider $2.00/ea. 4x Panasonics off E-bay next if that's an option for you.

http://www.ebay.com/itm/30-Panasonic...55cf4da2c#shId
http://www.ebay.com/itm/5-Panasonic-...#ht_1977wt_926

You're saying that an ISO created from the same set of files results in the same buffer issue when burned? My first inclination would be to have you check your hard drive with HD Tune for problems, but this doesn't sound like the problem. You may want to post the issue in the Imgburn forum.
__________________
Currently installed for testing: Lite-on DH20A4P-04(9P54) + Sony Optiarc AD-7200A(1.Z3) x2 "You want WHAT? OK, I can do that". + AD-7200S(1Z2) + AD-5280-CB-PLUS(1.Z7) + BenQ DW1650(BCIC) + BenQ DW1640(BSLB) x2 + Lite-on iHAS324-08 A(BL1H) + Asus DRW-24B1LT@iHAS424(ZLC1) + Asus DRW-24B1ST@iHAS324(BL1H) + Plextor PX-760A(1.03) + LG BD-RE WH10LS30(1.00) + Lite-on iHES208(8LOC) + Sammy SH-BO83L(SB01) + Pioneer BDR206(1.05) + Lite-on iHBS112-29(CLOK) + Pioneer BDR-205(1.12) + LG WH12LS39(1.00) + Lite-on iHBS212@Plextor PX-LB950SA(1.02)
deanwitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2012   #10
MyCE Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 79
There is a simple rule for LiteOn BD-Burners:

Don´t burn a LTH with a LiteOn!

There is a good reason why Verbatim doesn´t recommend its LTH blank discs for LiteOn burners.

http://www.verbatim.de/pdfs/BD%20Wri...tibility_1.pdf
katraine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2012   #11
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by deanwitty View Post
The 112 and 212 are very different drives with different chipsets. Results with those two drives will be different. Discspeed scans should not be compared to scans around this forum using Opti Drive Control, which is a newer program and handles Blu-ray better. Do not use Discspeed or ODC for Blu-ray burning. They are both very poor for this. Use Imgburn to burn your discs and quality scan them at 4x speed with ODC.

Scans of LTH media have commonly been not as good as good quality HTL BD-R's. Where are you located that you don't have access to anything but LTH?

Your buffer issues are almost certainly a result of Discspeed's poor burning ability.

You can use the info in this post to view your burn info graph using Imgburn for burning.
Quote:
Originally Posted by katraine View Post
There is a simple rule for LiteOn BD-Burners:

Don´t burn a LTH with a LiteOn!

There is a good reason why Verbatim doesn´t recommend its LTH blank discs for LiteOn burners.

http://www.verbatim.de/pdfs/BD%20Wri...tibility_1.pdf
This is what seems to be an average burn the liteon and verbatim LTH:
Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


Out of about 40 burnt discs with the liteon, I've only had 2 coasters (as in put them back in and the disc couldn't be read from). I noticed that my results are "only" about twice as bad as this guys' burn, which another member said was a good quality scan, for 12x write. Should I burn a test disc with opti for you guys?

Thing is, when I started out with dvd's, I had no idea about quality then, either. No-name burner, no name discs. When I learned about disc quality tests, I went back and scanned them, and the results were 10 times worse then anything I've seen with these verbatims. Yet I've never had any of them fail on me, even years after.

I've basically had about 60 LTH's given to me, so I guess if these scans really are that bad, I can just swap drives to a more compatible brand, however, would it still be ok to re-burn the data off of the liteon discs? I mean, will the burn result be any different than burning the data off of the hard drive again? (Which would be a real pain, since the files are in other locations now and I've ditched the compilation files)
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012   #12
MyCE Resident
 
_chef_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: @FX labs .de ...playing LLAMATRON :-]
Posts: 30,613
The scan looks not that bad....but the MID??
__________________
Enable DMA with micrAp$0ft Enable DMA free at your will busTRACE => Upper/Lower Filters Util
DevCon
***HOW TO ... Delete the Upper & Lower Filters!***

If you expect help then please use the powerful SEARCH. Try ThreatFire
I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring & HD DVD media. Please PM me if you can help me.

Vamos Tribbles! V-a-m-o-s!!
_chef_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012   #13
Senior Administrator
 
Liggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Monkey Island
Posts: 8,210
Quote:
Originally Posted by _chef_ View Post
The scan looks not that bad....but the MID??
Seems to be a bug in ODC. I have the same issue on my PC.
__________________
You need to flash or dump your NEC DVD burner firmwares on your Mac, Windows, DOS or Linux machine? Just try Binflash.
Visit Liggy's and Dee's Optiarc and NEC firmware and tools page for all kind of information about NEC and Optiarc drives.


Unrequested PM about drive problems will not be answered!
Liggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2012   #14
cvs
MyCE Resident
 
cvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 1,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by _chef_ View Post
The scan looks not that bad....but the MID??
It is a known and rather annoying bug in version 1.51. Most people have reverted back to the previous ODC 1.50 version because of it.
cvs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012   #15
New Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by _chef_ View Post
The scan looks not that bad....but the MID??
VERBATIMu.
hxclespaulplayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012   #16
Moderator
 
deanwitty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: The 10th city outside the 2nd City, U.S.
Posts: 2,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by hxclespaulplayer View Post

Out of about 40 burnt discs with the liteon, I've only had 2 coasters (as in put them back in and the disc couldn't be read from). I noticed that my results are "only" about twice as bad as this guys' burn, which another member said was a good quality scan, for 12x write. Should I burn a test disc with opti for you guys?

Thing is, when I started out with dvd's, I had no idea about quality then, either. No-name burner, no name discs. When I learned about disc quality tests, I went back and scanned them, and the results were 10 times worse then anything I've seen with these verbatims. Yet I've never had any of them fail on me, even years after.

I've basically had about 60 LTH's given to me, so I guess if these scans really are that bad, I can just swap drives to a more compatible brand, however, would it still be ok to re-burn the data off of the liteon discs? I mean, will the burn result be any different than burning the data off of the hard drive again? (Which would be a real pain, since the files are in other locations now and I've ditched the compilation files)
Judging by this post and the one before it, you may do best burning your remaining LTH at 4x.

With LTH media, I think that your TRT is a very important measure of quality. More so than with HTL. While I have very good correlation between HTL quality scans and read-back tests, it seems that error rates reported by our consumer drives can go higher with LTH discs before showing up as a read-back problem. It seems likely that the differing physical characteristics of the two media are affecting error reporting, and they may require different baselines for what is bad, good, excellent.

Looked at from an LTH baseline, your burn does not look bad enough to assume it might be a problem. I would mark a couple of the discs that gave you the worst looking Q-scans and perform TRTs on them at 4-6 month intervals to watch for deterioration. Use Imgburn's "create image file from disc" function to rip one of the worst-looking burns back to your hard drive. Take a look at the Imgburn rip graph for slow-downs. This real-world disc test can tell you if those discs are 100% readable today and likely to remain so for a bit. Yes you can use a rip from your burns to re-burn if Imgburn reports no problems in the process.

More than a few sources have stated that the LTH dye is not as durable as the HTL. But that is not to say that they can't last 5+ years.
__________________
Currently installed for testing: Lite-on DH20A4P-04(9P54) + Sony Optiarc AD-7200A(1.Z3) x2 "You want WHAT? OK, I can do that". + AD-7200S(1Z2) + AD-5280-CB-PLUS(1.Z7) + BenQ DW1650(BCIC) + BenQ DW1640(BSLB) x2 + Lite-on iHAS324-08 A(BL1H) + Asus DRW-24B1LT@iHAS424(ZLC1) + Asus DRW-24B1ST@iHAS324(BL1H) + Plextor PX-760A(1.03) + LG BD-RE WH10LS30(1.00) + Lite-on iHES208(8LOC) + Sammy SH-BO83L(SB01) + Pioneer BDR206(1.05) + Lite-on iHBS112-29(CLOK) + Pioneer BDR-205(1.12) + LG WH12LS39(1.00) + Lite-on iHBS212@Plextor PX-LB950SA(1.02)
deanwitty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2012   #17
MyCE Resident
 
_chef_'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: @FX labs .de ...playing LLAMATRON :-]
Posts: 30,613
Quote:
Originally Posted by hxclespaulplayer View Post
VERBATIMu.
Thanks.
__________________
Enable DMA with micrAp$0ft Enable DMA free at your will busTRACE => Upper/Lower Filters Util
DevCon
***HOW TO ... Delete the Upper & Lower Filters!***

If you expect help then please use the powerful SEARCH. Try ThreatFire
I am looking for DVD-R for Authoring & HD DVD media. Please PM me if you can help me.

Vamos Tribbles! V-a-m-o-s!!
_chef_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
High quality on computer, low quality on dvd disc... is it Nero? Jon Dough Nero & InCD 0 20-05-2006 22:53
Bought 4166B today - I'm very pleased Dervatl LG Writer 1 10-04-2006 11:42
Bought my first Benq Drive today (1620) Clany BenQ / Philips Writer 9 26-03-2005 20:05
Today I bought the SOHW-832S... olli987 LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer 70 26-05-2004 09:47
Bought LiteOn 52327S today HONG KONGer LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer 2 12-07-2003 00:28

This page was also found with these words


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:24.
Top