PlexWriter Premium 2 review (by HWP)

Plextor Writer Discuss, PlexWriter Premium 2 review (by HWP) at CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers forum; This thread is to collect my findings about my newly acquired Premium2. Production date: May 2006 S/N 109xxx TLA# 0101 Firmware 1.01 This thread is for the collection of the review results only. For questions or discussions about this review please use this thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=193782 Thanks! Last edited by crossg;

  1. Old Posted:
    • # 1
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    This thread is to collect my findings about my newly acquired Premium2.

    Production date: May 2006
    S/N 109xxx
    TLA# 0101
    Firmware 1.01

    This thread is for the collection of the review results only.

    For questions or discussions about this review please use this thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=193782 Thanks!
    Last edited by crossg; 22-09-2006 at 01:23. Reason: fixed link after thread merge
    default_avatar
    Today (MyCE Staff)
    Posts: 15,596
  2. Old Posted:
    • # 2
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Writing curves

    The Premium 2 introduces 48x CAV and 2x CLV writing over the original Premium. Interestingly the 48x CAV writing speed is not an extension of the existing 40x P-CAV speed. Instead an entirely new curve has been implemented.

    The following graph shows the write transfer-rate curves for 23-52x and 21-48x CAV, 20-40x, 20-32x 20-24x P-CAV curves.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png Writing curves.png (18.8 KB, 1564 views)
  3. Old Posted:
    • # 3
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Plextor


    The Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (18.9 KB, 1577 views)
    File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (18.7 KB, 1558 views)
    File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1550 views)
  4. Old Posted:
    • # 4
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim


    Again the Premium2 shows quite a bit higher Focus Error than the Premium. Note that AFAIK Taiyo Yuden does not produce 52x media. So these are very likely 48x media only.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (19.0 KB, 1569 views)
    File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (19.3 KB, 1568 views)
    File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1573 views)
  5. Old Posted:
    • # 5
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Ritek, Type 7, 700MB, 48x, as sold by TDK (Metallic)


    This time the Premium2 shows only marginally higher Focus Error than the Premium.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
  6. Old Posted:
    • # 6
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC (Gold reflection layer)


    Again the Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium but lower Tracking Error. Since these media are 40x only and the FE/TE-Test is done at 52x in the

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTnok.png (18.5 KB, 1542 views)
    File Type: png P2 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTnok.png (18.8 KB, 1543 views)
    File Type: png 760 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTok.png (17.3 KB, 1532 views)
  7. Old Posted:
    • # 7
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Sony, Type 6, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Sony


    The Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTnok.png (17.1 KB, 1511 views)
    File Type: png P2 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTnok.png (17.2 KB, 1506 views)
    File Type: png 760 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTok.png (17.7 KB, 1499 views)
  8. Old Posted:
    • # 8
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Prodisc Technologies, Type 9, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Pleomax (Samsung)


    I knew these were going to be bad even before I bought them. I just needed something bad to test and was wondering just how bad it would be.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
  9. Old Posted:
    • # 9
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE-Test comparison
    Moser Baer India, Type 6, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim


    Premium show higher Tracking Error and Premium 2 shows higher Focus Error.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (17.2 KB, 1407 views)
    File Type: png P2 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (17.7 KB, 1396 views)
    File Type: png 760 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTok.png (16.0 KB, 1395 views)
  10. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    FE/TE conclusions

    On one hand it seems that my Premium 2 does focus slightly worse on the disc surfaces than my Premium does. On the other hand the Premium 2 sometimes seems to have a slight advantage in Tracking. Overall they are rather close together which we can take as an indication that the laser unit used in the Premium 2 is nothing revolutionary new. Any difference in favour of the Premium is small enough to be attributed to a more mature servo driving algorythm in the firmware. After all we must not forget that the Premium is a mature product while the Premium 2 is still in it's infancy (a fact that will surely also show clearly in further testing).

    In comparison the laser unit of the PX-760 with it's "advanced intelligent tilt" capability shows a marked improvement, while a PX-716 would show about the same results as the Premium and Premium 2 (for results of the 716 see the generic CD-scans thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=136562 ).
  11. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Bad audio disc reading
    Prince, The very best of Prince (Warner Bros. 8122742722)

    "Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This pressed this is of general low quality.

    Premium: Can read this @22-52x but sometimes needs to slow down. Can read this without problems @18-40x (first scan)
    Premium 2: Can read this @14-32x maximum (second scan)
    PX-760: Can only read this at a maximum of 8x (no scan provided).
    Attached Images
    File Type: png CD Very Best of Prince 52x 40x.png (7.4 KB, 1399 views)
    File Type: png P2 Prince the Very Best R.png (16.9 KB, 1398 views)

    Last edited by hwp; 21-06-2007 at 13:50.
  12. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Bad audio disc reading
    Donna Lewis, Now in a Minute (Atlantic 7567-82762-2)

    "Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This pressed disc has severe problems in the outer area.

    Premium: Can read this with 20-48x up to the 28min mark, then slowdown to 4x (first scan)
    Premium 2: Can read this with 20-48x up to the 34min mark, then slowdown to 4x (first scan)
    PX-760: Can read this with 16-34x maximum (second scan provied).
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P12 Donna Lewis Now and Forever R.png (18.0 KB, 1385 views)
    File Type: png 760 Donna Lewis Now and Forever R.png (17.0 KB, 1379 views)

    Last edited by hwp; 04-11-2007 at 09:58.
  13. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Bad audio disc reading
    Queen, Greatest Hits II (Parlophone CDP79.7971 2)

    "Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This disc is of general bad quality.

    Premium: Can read this @8x speed maximum (no scan provided).
    Premium 2: Can read this with 10-24x maximum (see scan)
    PX-760: Can read this @8x speed maximum (no scan provided).
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P2 Queen Greatest Hits II R.png (16.6 KB, 1381 views)
  14. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Verbatim

    FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

    The Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus and Tracking Error than the Premium. The Premium 2 is on par with the PX-760 when it comes to tracking but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (18.3 KB, 1358 views)
    File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.9 KB, 1356 views)
    File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.3 KB, 1363 views)
  15. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
    Moser Baer India, Type 6, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim

    FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

    Again the Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus and Tracking Error than the Premium. The Premium especially shows more pronounced spikes in focus. The Premium 2 is slightly better in tracking than the PX-760 but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (18.2 KB, 1328 views)
    File Type: png P2 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.9 KB, 1324 views)
    File Type: png 760 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1320 views)
  16. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
    Sony, Type 6, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Sony

    FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

    The Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus Error than the Premium. The Premium especially shows more pronounced spikes in focus. Premium 2 and Premium are about on par when it comes to tracking. The Premium 2 is better in tracking than the PX-760 but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTnok.png (19.3 KB, 1314 views)
    File Type: png P2 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTok.png (18.9 KB, 1315 views)
    File Type: png 760 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTok.png (18.8 KB, 1307 views)

    Last edited by crossg; 23-09-2006 at 20:44. Reason: correction requested by hwp
  17. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
    Prodisc Technologies, Type 9, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Pleomax (Samsung)

    FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

    The Premium 2 shows better results than the Premium. FE/TE-Test thinks the Premium and PX-760 can't write this even @4x.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
  18. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
    MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC

    FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

    Again the Premium 2 shows better results than the Premium. The PX-760 looses in tracking and wins in focussing against the Premium 2.

    Scans below are:
    Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
    Attached Images
    File Type: png P1 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (18.6 KB, 1304 views)
    File Type: png P2 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (17.8 KB, 1298 views)
    File Type: png 760 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (17.8 KB, 1295 views)
  19. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Low speed FE/TE-Test conclusions

    Compared to the high speed tests the Premium 2 beats the Premium regularly at low speed and even manages to beat the PX-760 in some cases (mostly in tracking). All this gives the indication that the Premium2 is indeed a drive that can handle / is spezicalized for low speeds as advertized.
  20. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: OFF
    52x writing speed selected, slowdowns as per writing graph

    Yuden CD-Rs are usually 48x certified only. The Premium usually rarely burns these at a full 52x. 1702 total C1 errors. Jitter-variations in the CAV-part of the burn.

    Below are writing, C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
  21. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: ON
    4x writing speed (pre-)selected, no slowdowns

    1956 total C1 errors. Nice regular Beta. Some Jitter variation.

    Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
    Attached Images
    File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x AMQR C1956 .png (20.9 KB, 1241 views)
    File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x AMQR BJ.png (20.0 KB, 1239 views)
  22. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: OFF
    2x writing speed selected

    2509 total C1 errors. Very nice Beta/Jitter!

    Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
    Attached Images
    File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 2x C2509 24x.png (22.5 KB, 1232 views)
    File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 2x BJ.png (19.2 KB, 1240 views)
  23. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: OFF
    40x writing speed selected, no slowdowns (52x speed offered by PoweRec but since these are archival-grade media with gold reflection layer I stuck with the certified maximum speed)

    8807 total C1 errors. Very nice Jitter. Beta ist ok too.

    Below are writing, C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
    Attached Images
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x W.png (15.9 KB, 1245 views)
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x C8807.png (23.3 KB, 1252 views)
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x BJ.png (19.4 KB, 1241 views)
  24. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: ON
    4x writing speed (pre-)selected, no slowdowns

    21977 total C1 errors. Comparing the total amount of C1 errors to burns @40x and @2x it almost looks as if these media don't like AMQR. Very nice Beta. Beta has some downward spikes.

    Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
    Attached Images
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x AMQR C21977.png (21.8 KB, 1237 views)
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x AMQR BJ.png (19.3 KB, 1236 views)
  25. Old Posted:
    hwp's Avatar
    hwp (Moderator)
    Posts: 2,358
    • Find More Posts by hwp
    MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
    PoweRec: ON
    GigaRec: OFF
    AMQR: OFF
    2x writing speed

    5639 total C1 errors. Very nice Beta/Jitter.

    Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
    Attached Images
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 2x C5639.png (21.9 KB, 1230 views)
    File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 2x BJ.png (19.6 KB, 1233 views)

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.

Search this Thread

New Posts

People who found this also searched for

  • c1195.png
  • plextor plexwriter premium 2
  • plextor plexwriter premium2
  • plextor premium 2 review
  • plextor premium 2 specifications
  • plextor unidade plexwriter premium2
  • plexwriter premium 2 silent
  • plexwriter premium2
  • site myce.com lg gsa-h44n dae test
  • 716 plexwriter
  • 716 plexwriter buy
  • alternative für plextor premium 2
  • amqr jitter
  • amqr plexwriter premium ii capacity
  • amqr write 800 time
  • c1 errors
  • cache pgmtegc1vg4j club.myce.com f57 burn-audio-lower-than-4x-217210 need program to burn audio cd at 4x
  • cache uf4fdqvibeuj meinews.niuz.biz audio-t160589.html audio-cd in welcher geschwindigkeit brennen?
  • codice plextor plexwriter premium2
  • emtec firmware on plextor
  • extension of grade level favor or infavor
  • firmware plexwriter premium2
  • focus or tracking error at 52x moser baer
  • gigarec amqr
  • lg gsa-h44n c2 error
  • lh-18a1p c2 error
  • masterizzatore plextor plexwriter premium2
  • moser baer india type 9 cyanine
  • msrp plextor premium 2 usa
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:05.
Top