PlexWriter Premium 2 review (by HWP)

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
Plextor Writer Discuss, PlexWriter Premium 2 review (by HWP) at CD and DVD Writers forum; This thread is to collect my findings about my newly acquired Premium2. Production date: May 2006 S/N 109xxx TLA# 0101 Firmware 1.01 This thread is for the collection of the review results only. For questions or discussions about this review please use this thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=193782 Thanks! Last edited by crossg;

Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
This thread is to collect my findings about my newly acquired Premium2.

Production date: May 2006
S/N 109xxx
TLA# 0101
Firmware 1.01

This thread is for the collection of the review results only.

For questions or discussions about this review please use this thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=193782 Thanks!
Last edited by crossg; 22-09-2006 at 02:23. Reason: fixed link after thread merge
default_avatar
Today (MyCE Staff)
Posts: 15,596
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Writing curves

The Premium 2 introduces 48x CAV and 2x CLV writing over the original Premium. Interestingly the 48x CAV writing speed is not an extension of the existing 40x P-CAV speed. Instead an entirely new curve has been implemented.

The following graph shows the write transfer-rate curves for 23-52x and 21-48x CAV, 20-40x, 20-32x 20-24x P-CAV curves.
Attached Images
File Type: png Writing curves.png (18.8 KB, 1431 views)
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Plextor


The Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (18.9 KB, 1441 views)
File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (18.7 KB, 1425 views)
File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Plextor) 48x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1418 views)
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim


Again the Premium2 shows quite a bit higher Focus Error than the Premium. Note that AFAIK Taiyo Yuden does not produce 52x media. So these are very likely 48x media only.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (19.0 KB, 1438 views)
File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (19.3 KB, 1438 views)
File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1442 views)
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Ritek, Type 7, 700MB, 48x, as sold by TDK (Metallic)


This time the Premium2 shows only marginally higher Focus Error than the Premium.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC (Gold reflection layer)


Again the Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium but lower Tracking Error. Since these media are 40x only and the FE/TE-Test is done at 52x in the

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTnok.png (18.5 KB, 1412 views)
File Type: png P2 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTnok.png (18.8 KB, 1412 views)
File Type: png 760 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x FTok.png (17.3 KB, 1401 views)
Old Posted: 19-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Sony, Type 6, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Sony


The Premium2 shows slightly higher Focus Error than the Premium.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTnok.png (17.1 KB, 1380 views)
File Type: png P2 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTnok.png (17.2 KB, 1376 views)
File Type: png 760 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x FTok.png (17.7 KB, 1370 views)
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Prodisc Technologies, Type 9, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Pleomax (Samsung)


I knew these were going to be bad even before I bought them. I just needed something bad to test and was wondering just how bad it would be.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE-Test comparison
Moser Baer India, Type 6, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim


Premium show higher Tracking Error and Premium 2 shows higher Focus Error.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (17.2 KB, 1277 views)
File Type: png P2 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTnok.png (17.7 KB, 1267 views)
File Type: png 760 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x FTok.png (16.0 KB, 1263 views)
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
FE/TE conclusions

On one hand it seems that my Premium 2 does focus slightly worse on the disc surfaces than my Premium does. On the other hand the Premium 2 sometimes seems to have a slight advantage in Tracking. Overall they are rather close together which we can take as an indication that the laser unit used in the Premium 2 is nothing revolutionary new. Any difference in favour of the Premium is small enough to be attributed to a more mature servo driving algorythm in the firmware. After all we must not forget that the Premium is a mature product while the Premium 2 is still in it's infancy (a fact that will surely also show clearly in further testing).

In comparison the laser unit of the PX-760 with it's "advanced intelligent tilt" capability shows a marked improvement, while a PX-716 would show about the same results as the Premium and Premium 2 (for results of the 716 see the generic CD-scans thread: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=136562 ).
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Bad audio disc reading
Prince, The very best of Prince (Warner Bros. 8122742722)

"Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This pressed this is of general low quality.

Premium: Can read this @22-52x but sometimes needs to slow down. Can read this without problems @18-40x (first scan)
Premium 2: Can read this @14-32x maximum (second scan)
PX-760: Can only read this at a maximum of 8x (no scan provided).
Attached Images
File Type: png CD Very Best of Prince 52x 40x.png (7.4 KB, 1269 views)
File Type: png P2 Prince the Very Best R.png (16.9 KB, 1269 views)

Last edited by hwp; 21-06-2007 at 14:50.
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Bad audio disc reading
Donna Lewis, Now in a Minute (Atlantic 7567-82762-2)

"Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This pressed disc has severe problems in the outer area.

Premium: Can read this with 20-48x up to the 28min mark, then slowdown to 4x (first scan)
Premium 2: Can read this with 20-48x up to the 34min mark, then slowdown to 4x (first scan)
PX-760: Can read this with 16-34x maximum (second scan provied).
Attached Images
File Type: png P12 Donna Lewis Now and Forever R.png (18.0 KB, 1256 views)
File Type: png 760 Donna Lewis Now and Forever R.png (17.0 KB, 1251 views)

Last edited by hwp; 04-11-2007 at 10:58.
Old Posted: 22-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Bad audio disc reading
Queen, Greatest Hits II (Parlophone CDP79.7971 2)

"Bad" in this case does not mean the presence of a copy protection but rather a bad production quality of a pressed audio CD. The CD is otherwise in very good condition (no scratches etc.). This disc is of general bad quality.

Premium: Can read this @8x speed maximum (no scan provided).
Premium 2: Can read this with 10-24x maximum (see scan)
PX-760: Can read this @8x speed maximum (no scan provided).
Attached Images
File Type: png P2 Queen Greatest Hits II R.png (16.6 KB, 1250 views)
Old Posted: 23-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Verbatim

FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

The Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus and Tracking Error than the Premium. The Premium 2 is on par with the PX-760 when it comes to tracking but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (18.3 KB, 1228 views)
File Type: png P2 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.9 KB, 1226 views)
File Type: png 760 Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.3 KB, 1235 views)
Old Posted: 23-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
Moser Baer India, Type 6, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim

FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

Again the Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus and Tracking Error than the Premium. The Premium especially shows more pronounced spikes in focus. The Premium 2 is slightly better in tracking than the PX-760 but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (18.2 KB, 1200 views)
File Type: png P2 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.9 KB, 1197 views)
File Type: png 760 MBI T6 700 (Verbatim) 52x 4x FTok.png (17.5 KB, 1193 views)
Old Posted: 23-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
Sony, Type 6, 700MB, 48x, as sold by Sony

FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

The Premium 2 shows slightly better Focus Error than the Premium. The Premium especially shows more pronounced spikes in focus. Premium 2 and Premium are about on par when it comes to tracking. The Premium 2 is better in tracking than the PX-760 but the PX-760 takes the crown when it comes to focussing.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTnok.png (19.3 KB, 1186 views)
File Type: png P2 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTok.png (18.9 KB, 1187 views)
File Type: png 760 SONY T6 700 (Sony) 48x 4x FTok.png (18.8 KB, 1178 views)

Last edited by crossg; 23-09-2006 at 21:44. Reason: correction requested by hwp
Old Posted: 23-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
Prodisc Technologies, Type 9, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Pleomax (Samsung)

FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

The Premium 2 shows better results than the Premium. FE/TE-Test thinks the Premium and PX-760 can't write this even @4x.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can not be written at the highest speed.
Old Posted: 23-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test comparison
MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC

FE/TE-Test run at 4x speed. (PTPXL doesn't offer to slow the Premium 2 to 2x in silent mode. As a side effect this also makes the results comparable.)

Again the Premium 2 shows better results than the Premium. The PX-760 looses in tracking and wins in focussing against the Premium 2.

Scans below are:
Premium: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Premium 2: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
PX-760a: Disc can be written at the highest speed.
Attached Images
File Type: png P1 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (18.6 KB, 1177 views)
File Type: png P2 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (17.8 KB, 1170 views)
File Type: png 760 MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 4x FTok.png (17.8 KB, 1168 views)
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Low speed FE/TE-Test conclusions

Compared to the high speed tests the Premium 2 beats the Premium regularly at low speed and even manages to beat the PX-760 in some cases (mostly in tracking). All this gives the indication that the Premium2 is indeed a drive that can handle / is spezicalized for low speeds as advertized.
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: OFF
52x writing speed selected, slowdowns as per writing graph

Yuden CD-Rs are usually 48x certified only. The Premium usually rarely burns these at a full 52x. 1702 total C1 errors. Jitter-variations in the CAV-part of the burn.

Below are writing, C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: ON
4x writing speed (pre-)selected, no slowdowns

1956 total C1 errors. Nice regular Beta. Some Jitter variation.

Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Attached Images
File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x AMQR C1956 .png (20.9 KB, 1113 views)
File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x AMQR BJ.png (20.0 KB, 1111 views)
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
Taiyo Yuden, Type 1, 700MB, 52x, as sold by Verbatim
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: OFF
2x writing speed selected

2509 total C1 errors. Very nice Beta/Jitter!

Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Attached Images
File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 2x C2509 24x.png (22.5 KB, 1104 views)
File Type: png Yuden T1 700 (Verbatim) 52x 2x BJ.png (19.2 KB, 1113 views)
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: OFF
40x writing speed selected, no slowdowns (52x speed offered by PoweRec but since these are archival-grade media with gold reflection layer I stuck with the certified maximum speed)

8807 total C1 errors. Very nice Jitter. Beta ist ok too.

Below are writing, C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Attached Images
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x W.png (15.9 KB, 1118 views)
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x C8807.png (23.3 KB, 1126 views)
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 40x BJ.png (19.4 KB, 1115 views)
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: ON
4x writing speed (pre-)selected, no slowdowns

21977 total C1 errors. Comparing the total amount of C1 errors to burns @40x and @2x it almost looks as if these media don't like AMQR. Very nice Beta. Beta has some downward spikes.

Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Attached Images
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x AMQR C21977.png (21.8 KB, 1111 views)
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x AMQR BJ.png (19.3 KB, 1110 views)
Old Posted: 24-09-2006
hwp's Avatar
hwp (Moderator)
Posts: 2,290
  • Find More Posts by hwp
MPO, Type 7, 700MB, 40x, as sold by EMTEC
PoweRec: ON
GigaRec: OFF
AMQR: OFF
2x writing speed

5639 total C1 errors. Very nice Beta/Jitter.

Below are C1/C2 and Beta/Jitter scans:
Attached Images
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 2x C5639.png (21.9 KB, 1103 views)
File Type: png MPO T7 700 (Emtec) 40x 2x BJ.png (19.6 KB, 1107 views)
There's more to MyCE.com

Listen up, we've got more. Product information on 107,830 products. Our experts have written 523 articles. We've gathered 16,131 news items for you to always keep updated.

Active Commenters

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

People who found this also searched for

  • plextor plexwriter premium2
  • plextor premium 2 review
  • gigarec amqr
  • my note premium ii review
  • or plexwriter premium 2
  • plextor plexwriter premium 2
  • plextor plexwriter premium2
  • plextor plexwriter premium2 test
  • plextor premium 2 review
  • plextor premium 2 review]
  • plextor premium ii test
  • plextor premium2 review
  • plextor premium2 test
  • plextor’s plexwriter premium2
  • plexwriter premium
  • plexwriter premium 2
  • plexwriter premium 2 forum
  • plexwriter premium ii
  • plexwriter premium or premium2
  • plexwriter premium vs premium 2
  • plexwriter premium2
  • plexwriter premium2 review
  • plexwriter premium2 test
  • premium2 scanning tracks
  • preview premium ii
  • review plextor premium 2
  • review plextor premium2
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 06:44.
Top