Results & Discussion: Sony MIT inconsistencies in Samsung SH-S203N

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
Blank Media Discuss, Sony MIT inconsistencies in Samsung SH-S203N at Consumables forum; Hi burned at 32x [allegedly] Sony branded Daxon MIT CD-R Attached Images BENQ____DVD_LS_DW1655_BCIB_08-August-2008_19_09.png (55.6 KB, 104 views) BENQ____DVD_LS_DW1655_BCIB_08-August-2008_19_14.png (66.3 KB, 106 views) BENQ____DVD_LS_DW1655_BCIB_08-August-2008_19_19.png (50.7 KB, 104 views) TSSTcorpCDDVDW_SH-S203N_SB02_08-August-2008_19_02.png (58.6 KB, 106 views)

NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 09-08-2008
Hi

burned at 32x [allegedly]
Sony branded Daxon MIT CD-R
default_avatar
Today (MyCE Staff)
Posts: 15,596
Womi's Avatar
Womi (CD Freaks Die Hard)
Posts: 1,062
Posted: 09-08-2008
Where is your problem

C1 errors and jitter are absolutely in spec. Your Samsung decided to slow down to 16x for some reason but that shouldnt happen on every CD-R.
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 09-08-2008
Hi

burned at 32x [allegedly]
Sony branded Daxon MIT CD-R
Arachne's Avatar
Arachne (Senior Moderator & Reviewer)
Posts: 28,633
Posted: 09-08-2008
I see no problem with the latest one either?

It burned at 32x, as required. Scan and TRT look alright.

Probably the Sammy slowed down on the first one due to varying quality of the media?
__________________
Current drives: Samsung SH-S223F (SB03 RPC1 + other goodies) + TSST (Samsung) TS-H653F (D200) + Samsung SH-S203N (SB02 RPC1 + other goodies) + Optiarc AD-5170S (1.12) + Litey LH-20A1H (LL0D) + Samsung SH-S182D (SB06 RPC1) x2 + LG E10N (JE07) + BenQ DW1650 (BCDC) + BenQ DW1640@164B (BEFB) + LG 4167B (DL13 TDB) + NEC ND-4551A (1.Z2) + LG GCE-8520B (1.00) + LiteOn SOHR-5239S (2S0B)
Retired: LiteOn LDW-851@SOHW-832 + LiteOn SOHW-1693S + LG 4163B + Pioneer DVR-115D
My Review PCs

How to delete your upper and lower filters : How to check/enable DMA by Womble

Click here to join cdfreaks.com and be part of our friendly community!
The CDFreaks Distributed Computing Teams need YOU! Join the Team(s) and help save some lives! Read more here
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 09-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arachne View Post
I see no problem with the latest one either?

It burned at 32x, as required. Scan and TRT look alright.

Probably the Sammy slowed down on the first one due to varying quality of the media?
Thanks for Arachne,

So there is nothing to worry about? Good... I just bought crap cheap media, b/c i could not find Verbatim branded CMC Magnetics CD-Rs on sale!

NBK
Albert's Avatar
Albert (Moderator)
Posts: 4,915
Posted: 09-08-2008
I wouldn't call it 100% crap. It's just not up to Verbatim standards ['cause it's not Verbatim]. But it's still good for day-to-day use.

When you start getting a bunch of C2 on a normal scan, then you should start calling it complete crap.
__________________
If you haven't already, take the time to register at CD Freaks [we welcome new users!]. ||| If you need a refresher of the rules, check them out here. ||| If you need a bit of assistance in posting, the general forum usage FAQ can be found here. ||| If you're new, the Newbie forum is a great place to start out, if you do nothing but introduce yourself. ||| Friendly reminder: Try to avoid sending PMs for technical help; they may get ignored. Besides, that's what the forums are for!

Resident college CD Freak, jack of many trades, math major, computer lover, and general geek. Recently nicknamed "Modbert"
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 09-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert View Post
I wouldn't call it 100% crap. It's just not up to Verbatim standards ['cause it's not Verbatim]. But it's still good for day-to-day use.

When you start getting a bunch of C2 on a normal scan, then you should start calling it complete crap.
Thanks for the info Albert,

NBK
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 21-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert View Post
I wouldn't call it 100% crap. It's just not up to Verbatim standards ['cause it's not Verbatim]. But it's still good for day-to-day use.

When you start getting a bunch of C2 on a normal scan, then you should start calling it complete crap.
Hi Albert,

look at this:
Attached Images
File Type: png BENQ____DVD_LS_DW1655_BCIB_21-August-2008_08_48.png (61.2 KB, 72 views)
Albert's Avatar
Albert (Moderator)
Posts: 4,915
Posted: 21-08-2008
NOW they're cruddy.

How does it look scanned on the Samsung? [Yes, I know about MediaTek DVD drives & CDs]
__________________
If you haven't already, take the time to register at CD Freaks [we welcome new users!]. ||| If you need a refresher of the rules, check them out here. ||| If you need a bit of assistance in posting, the general forum usage FAQ can be found here. ||| If you're new, the Newbie forum is a great place to start out, if you do nothing but introduce yourself. ||| Friendly reminder: Try to avoid sending PMs for technical help; they may get ignored. Besides, that's what the forums are for!

Resident college CD Freak, jack of many trades, math major, computer lover, and general geek. Recently nicknamed "Modbert"
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 21-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Albert View Post
NOW they're cruddy.

How does it look scanned on the Samsung? [Yes, I know about MediaTek DVD drives & CDs]
Hi Albert,

It would scan with C2 errors but would freeze Windows requiring a reboot!

EDIT: A couple of days ago i just bought 150 MIT Verbatim CD-Rs.

Thanks for responding,
NBK
evo69's Avatar
evo69 (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 904
Posted: 21-08-2008
Holy... Sony Daxons? I have Verbatim Daxons that are MIM that fares a lot better than that. I've only gone through about 30 discs (of 2x100 spindles) and I haven't encountered that (yet).

Your latest scan is pure and absolute crap. No doubt. Are there any physical/visual defects on the disc that is apparent?
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 21-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by evo69 View Post
Holy... Sony Daxons? I have Verbatim Daxons that are MIM that fares a lot better than that. I've only gone through about 30 discs (of 2x100 spindles) and I haven't encountered that (yet).

Your latest scan is pure and absolute crap. No doubt. Are there any physical/visual defects on the disc that is apparent?
HI evo69,

My Sony branded Daxons are MIT...

There are no defects that i can see. I am going to junk the whole lot!

Thanks
NBK
evo69's Avatar
evo69 (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 904
Posted: 21-08-2008
What a waste ain't it? Better than figuring out where all your data went after a few months of burning on bad discs.

Better luck on your next purchase. I've never had such a negative experience with Sony media and I stick with Verbs or Sonys when I can get my hands on them. No doubt that quality varies.
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 23-08-2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by evo69 View Post
What a waste ain't it? Better than figuring out where all your data went after a few months of burning on bad discs.

Better luck on your next purchase. I've never had such a negative experience with Sony media and I stick with Verbs or Sonys when I can get my hands on them. No doubt that quality varies.
Hi evo69,

I am going to see if i can get warranty service from Sony for their junk CD-Rs!!!

Thanks
NBK
NBK's Avatar
NBK (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 783
Posted: 24-08-2008
Hi

another disc with C2 errors
Sony CD-R MIT [Daxon]
Nero DiscSpeed 4.11.2.0 'Create Disc'
set to burn @32x, but burned @16x instead
Samsung SH-S203N fully patched SB02
There's more to MyCE.com

Listen up, we've got more. Product information on 102,541 products. Our experts have written 521 articles. We've gathered 16,068 news items for you to always keep updated.

Active Commenters

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:41.
Top