Old 19-05-2003   #1
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
High speed vs low speed burning

This topic seems to come up a lot, and several people have already posted some test results. but I thought it deserved it's own thread.
The question is whether low burn speeds, using high speed media, will produce better quality, worse quality or no difference.
I invite others to post their own test results to contribute to the discussion, particularly with different burners and different media. Since we are dependant on C1 measurement to evaluate this, obviously we will be limited to drives and scanning ware that support C1 reporting. I also suggest that for the sake of fair comparisons we stick to 40x for the max burn speed, to eliminate some of the differences between drives and media at higher speeds.

Here's my first offering:
TY(Fuji) 48x media, 700MB image file:
Burned at 40x:



Burned at 4x:



As you can see, the slow burn produces higher error rates, but not enough to create any reading problems (no C2). But it certainly points to the conclusion that slower is not better. The error rate at 4x is about 3x higher than at 40x.
rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-05-2003   #2
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
Ritek TG (TDK) 52x

Burned at 40x:



Burned at 4x:

rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2003   #3
CD Freaks Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 123
some sort of jitter testing should better reflect the issue you are trying to address here.

maybe alexnoe can provide us with some info with his plex premium.
idiot@ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2003   #4
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
I'm not certain that it really matters what the cause of the errors is, but any testing is worthwhile. I didn't know that Alex has a Plex Premium, I was really tempted when they showed up at the BestBuy here. But $130 = when you can get 2 LiteOns for the same price.
rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-05-2003   #5
CD Freaks Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 123
well

it gives you 3 more readings
which we do not know the exact meaning yet...
FE/TE/Jitter

and faster beta testing

as for the reason why you have higher c1s on the outter edge with those high speed discs, is because that the dye layer thickness is different there, and the drive's OPT procedure didn't adjust to just in time, or think that the laser power needs to be adjusted.

you can see this kind of behavier in many high speed discs.
idiot@ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2003   #6
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
@idiot@ace: I certainly could, if my Plextor had arrived already! It is scheduled for monday

@rdgrimes: In this case, I don't care about how many LiteOns I get for that price, because none of these LiteOns can do Jitter / FE measurements
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2003   #7
CD Freaks Junior Member
 
The-poacher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: UK
Posts: 66
Fast Or Slow

Buy a 48 speed burner <<>> burn @ 48x

Thats me <> sorry but all the tests etc wont convince me otherwise no point in buying it to burn @ slow speeds
& I dont get coasters & the resulting CD's work.
__________________
Life is far too important a thing ever to talk seriously about.

Oscar Wilde
The-poacher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22-05-2003   #8
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
alexnoe
You going to do a review on that drive? Will it measure C1 with the Plextools?
rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-05-2003   #9
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
Quote:
You going to do a review on that drive?
No, GF is going to review it. I bought mine, using real money...now all it has to do is arriving here!
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2003   #10
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
20x:
Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


52x:
Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


Written in Plextor Premium, on Plextor-Taiyo Yuden - media
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2003   #11
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
I see that the Premium only test-reads at 24x CAV max, correct?
rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-05-2003   #12
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
4x, 8x and 10x-24x CAV is possible. GF will certainly go into these tests a bit deeper in the review
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15-06-2003   #13
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
The same Taiyo Yuden at 4x in the PP:

Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


So, out of 4x, 20x and 52x, the worst is 20x...
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2003   #14
CD Freaks Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 124
Please bear with me..On the graphs you just showed...with the lines in green...

It sure appears the 4x is the best...20x the worst and 52x in the middle...

Who says slower isn't better? Unless I'm reading something wrong...
joelmon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16-06-2003   #15
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
I'm testing with the Plextor Premium, while rdgrimes is testing with a LiteOn

=> the LiteOn behaves best at moderate speeds, while the Plextor does not like moderate speeds on the Taiyo Yuden discs, but prefers the extremes 4x and 52x.

This should make you a bit more sensible to burning speeds and show that changing the burner means redoing all tests
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)

Last edited by alexnoe; 16-06-2003 at 23:16.
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003   #16
cjr
MyCE Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 77
As soon as I have the plextor premium, I will post the results of burning 40x media with 1x (audio burner). I do this quite frequently with TDK/Ritek and I feel the results may not be poor, as even my worst CD-player can read them without producing any E32 (the same CDP is not able to read the low-speed-optimized Sony-Audio-CDs errorfree).
I think the problem, that high-speed cdrs are burnt worse at low speeds in PC-burners, is situated partly in the burner, being not able to calibrate the laser-power correctly for low speeds.
cjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003   #17
Optical storage technical expert
 
spath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 994
> I think the problem, that high-speed cdrs are
> burnt worse at low speeds in PC-burners, is
> situated partly in the burner, being not able to
> calibrate the laser-power correctly for low
> speeds.

And what makes you think that laser power
calibration is more difficult at low speeds ?
spath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17-06-2003   #18
cjr
MyCE Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 77
I think the laser diode will not have a linear characteristic over the whole range from 4x-52x, thus it may operate under non optimal conditions at low powers.

Fact is, that my audio writer writes CDRWs1-4x at 1x much better than plextor 48 at 4x (lowest speed). Even the very bad technics SLPG-5 CDP reads these CDRWs errorfree, but if burnt with plextor, errors are reported by this CDP (not frequently, but every some seconds an E32).
Unfortunately I cannot test the CDR/Ws at the moment, as I am waiting for my plextor premium USB (not available, where I live at the moment)
cjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003   #19
Optical storage technical expert
 
spath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 994
It has already been shown that some drives
have problems burning at low speeds, but do
you have any evidence that the laser power is
the cause of this instead of, for instance, motor
control ?
spath is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003   #20
Retired Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Deadwood
Posts: 11,533
Or maybe it's just the media. But I fail to understand what difference it makes, considering the low error rates available at high speed.
rdgrimes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003   #21
cjr
MyCE Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 77
You are right, motor control could be an other reason leading to less precision at low speeds.
cjr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18-06-2003   #22
CD Freaks Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 72
If motor control is a valid argument, then this would stand as a simple test of the better build quality of the Plextor. I remember reading a thread at Ars, and this Preacherboy guy was talking about how very expensive million buck plus machines that do blur testing say that the liteon waveforms are a mess while the plextor's are much tighter. This is not a test that can be done at home.

As empirical evidence, I submit that the killed 163D drive of mine, plastic gears and stuff are clearly visible.. this doesn't strike me as 'reliable' since plastic softens and deforms over time depending on the quality and type of the plastic.. and these are high speed drives too.

Cameras have started to make their gears out of lightweight metal, and every time they've switched to plastic gearing, people have been critical resulting in occassional reversals.

Incidentally on my noname media which I now use only for experimentation with, it burns best at it's maximum smartburn speed on the liteon and worst at the slowest speed.
Technarch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-06-2003   #23
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
Plextor Premium again. Media: Verbatim 48x Super Azo:

52x burning:
Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.


4x burning
Embedded Images

View/download images and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

You must be registered in order view images in this forum.
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003   #24
CD Freaks Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 112
Alex'. what's the average error rate on your verbatim 48X at 48X or at 52X?

I wonder if it's better than my LiteOn.
NOVA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003   #25
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,695
At 52x, I get 0.7 when scanning with the Plextor, and about 0.2 when scanning with the LiteOn.

The Premium does not support 48x.
__________________
Asus P4C800E-Deluxe, Win XP, P4/2800 HT, 2048 MB RAM, 600 GB HDD, Plextor PX712/716/755/Premium, LG 4120B, Pioneer A08, Pioneer A09, NEC ND-3540A/4550A
------------------------------------------------
If at first you don't succeed, redefine success!
How a troll wants to force users of Linux to buy Windows just to make use of Plextor DVD writer unique functions
------------------------------------------------
PxScan/PxView (compatible to Premium, PX-712, PX-714, PX-716), now with built-in picture file output
Bitsetting via Autostart
My Blog about DADVSI (new french copyright)
alexnoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Does burning at a low speed help? varunmehta CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers 7 20-05-2006 13:54
burning at low speed purohit CD, DVD and Blu-ray Writers 2 16-07-2005 10:45
What is technical difference with high speed and low speed cd-rw drives boxmaster Blank Media 1 10-03-2004 07:53
Burning at low speed with 24Maxx1040 h0ax Newbie Forum 4 09-12-2003 20:34
High Speed Drive w/ Low Speed Media? softwareguy Burning Software 2 01-06-2002 06:57


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 15:22.
Top