Go Back   Club Myce > Hardware > Blank Media



Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 19-09-2006   #1
CDFreaks Resident
 
dodecahedron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 668
bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

(sorry in advance for the long post and large number of pics).

prompted to try media scanning at high speeds by the discussion in this thread
http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=193164
i finally used MCSE to remove the riplock from my BenQ DW1620 B7W9.
then i took a data DVD containing backup data that i'd burned a few days ago, burned on my LG GSA-H10L firmware LL11 (unmodified in any way), and scanned it and was unpleasantly surprised.

the TRT on the LG is just fine (there are a few wriggles on the curve, but i never get any better than this, never get a 'perfect' curve with no wriggles). the 8x scan on the BenQ is OK, roughly what i usually get, roughly what i got from other discs of this media (and taking into account that it's a BenQ scannign a burn of an LG H10x drive).

(i never get great scans like i see on the forum i don't know if it's because of lemon drives, or something with my system, Athlon XP2000+ not good enough, not enough cooling/high temps in the case, no-good PSU)

i'm really upset. needless to say i'm very alarmed by this.
i don't scan all my burns, but usually do (esp. data backup) and am used to what i got with the LG, Toshiba and 8x BenQ TRTs and 8x BenQ Disc Quality Scan.
so far i assumed that these are OK, if not great, burns.
but now after the 16x TRT on the BenQ i'm really worried!
pics below.

now i think maybe all my burns are bad ?

i don't know what to make of it:
bad batch of media?
Verbatim DVD+R 16x, MIT by CMC (according to cakebox and serial starting with PAPA...), stamper code ZD3056-DVR-T47D)
a bad burn?
a problem with the riplock-removed B7W9 firmware for my BenQ 1620 ?

i'd greatly appreciate any comments.

pics:
1. TRT on the LG GSA-H10L LL11
2. TRT on Toshiba SD-M1712 DVD-ROM
3-5. TRT on BenQ DW1620 B7W9 (MCSE speed-hacked) @ 8x, 12x, 16x resp.
6-8. Disc Quality Scan on on BenQ DW1620 @ 8x, 12x, 16x resp.
Attached Images

View/download attachments and remove advertisements by registering now! (it's easy, free and takes less than a minute)

To view attachments in this forum your post count must be 2 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
__________________
One Ring to rule them all, One Ring to find them,
One Ring to bring them all and in the darkness bind them
JRRT

Last edited by dodecahedron; 19-09-2006 at 08:32.
dodecahedron is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today
Register to remove me
 
 
Join Date: Today
Location: Myce HQ
Posts: Zillions
Old 19-09-2006   #2
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,163
Re: bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

It looks to me to be more an issue with the drive rather than the media, the way it is topping out at 10x. Your 12x and 16x PI/PIF tests are not topping out at 10x though, but there is a slight increase in reported jitter around 12% that coincides with the 10x limitation in the TRT.

A couple things to know: Benq drives become particularly sensitive to jitter levels of 12% and higher, so it may just be that the combination of higher read speeds and high jitter that is causing the drive to limit its read speed. It's also known that Benqs are picky about discs burned from your model of LG drive, so that is probably another factor to consider. Whether the LG is truly creating discs with jitter that high or not, I don't know. If they are, that just comes with the territory of Benqs and their dislike for discs with high jitter levels.

In any case, I would not be too concerned about your burns. Because of the Benq's higher reported jitter levels, the error levels are probably being inflated a fair amount. Your Benq will generally do a very good job of testing discs but for burns from you LG it is not the best choice, in that situation you'd be better off with a Liteon as it is not as sensitive to higher jitter levels, regardless of whether those jitter levels being reported by your Benq are accurate or not.

Confused yet? Long story short, your burns are very likely just fine.
scoobiedoobie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2006   #3
CE Freak
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: United States
Posts: 2,947
Re: bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

I have found messing with firmware seems to cause me more trouble than it is worth.

Perhaps back-flashing to a previous firmware, testing it, then seeing if the standard B7W9 flashes successfully might be worth a shot?
BeardedKirklander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Today
Always the best offers
 
 
Join Date: Today
Location: Myce HQ
Posts: Zillions
Old 19-09-2006   #4
TL0
CDFreaks Resident
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,178
Re: bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

The PIF being reported by your 1620 in the 8x scan is within the range I have experienced so far with my current batch of CMC MCC004 media (ZD5136). What write speed are you using? as that can influence the results?

You may wish to try the Qscan option in Qsuite on your BenQ 1620 to see how the FE/TE scans on a blank disc from that batch. If it's acceptable at your chosen write speed, a burn done on the BenQ 1620 would help show if it was media related or a BenQ scanning/reading incompatability.
TL0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2006   #5
CD Freaks Media Expert
 
dakhaas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,952
Re: bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

OFFTOPIC

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobiedoobie
Whether the LG is truly creating discs with jitter that high or not, I don't know. If they are, that just comes with the territory of Benqs and their dislike for discs with high jitter levels.
I can say that some folks are currently looking into this one.
__________________
---------------Queensryche OPEN-----------------

Open your eyes. Just say what you want to say?
Open your eyes, you see yours isn’t the only way .
Open your eyes. To you everyone is blind.
Open your eyes and your mind.
dakhaas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-09-2006   #6
Retired Senior Administrator and Review Coordinator USA
 
zevia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 10,476
Re: bad media, bad scan or bad un-riplocked BenQ drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobiedoobie
It looks to me to be more an issue with the drive rather than the media, the way it is topping out at 10x.
As scoobiedoobie suspected, there is data transfer rate issue here. Did you put the drive(s) internally? What is the burst rate?
__________________
Click here to join CDFreaks.com

Join CDFreaks Distributed Computing Team, have fun while helping to save some lives!

My review PC & Specs & Media
Blu-ray to DVD guide

Forum Rules | Blu-ray UDF Driver
BenQ/Philips FAQ and tools: BQFlasher, MCSE, WOPC Tool, WinDWFlash

LG BE06LU11 Blu-ray | LG GGW-H10N Blu-ray/HD-DVD | LG GBW-H10N Blu-ray | Panasonic SW-5582 Blu-ray
zevia is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
NEC 3540A - bad drive, bad media, or bad luck ? mf915 NEC / Optiarc Writer 9 19-09-2006 16:28
bad drive? bad media? bad flash? SirZoltan BenQ / Philips Writer 5 12-01-2005 08:52
First scan with US0N - Bad firmware or bad media? misfits7 LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer 7 29-06-2004 10:35
CRC errors on burned DVDs? Bad media, bad drive? Shang Newbie Forum 3 26-06-2004 18:49
My 411s - Bad drive, bad media (Ritek +R), or weird KProbe? gof LiteOn / PLDS / Sony Writer 22 18-03-2004 07:41


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 18:30.
Top