Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
General Software Discuss, FS on XP at Software forum; For the people who are running xp ...

View Poll Results: What Filesystem do you have With Windows XP?

NTFS 23 69.70%
FAT 32 11 33.33%
other 1 3.03%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 33. You may not vote on this poll
shuss's Avatar
shuss (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,431
Posted: 11-08-2002
For the people who are running xp ...
default_avatar
Today (MyCE Staff)
Posts: 15,596
Mr. Belvedere's Avatar
Mr. Belvedere (MyCE Resident)
Posts: 15,624
Posted: 11-08-2002
FAT32 , because some of my drives are in swap bays
__________________
I might be evil... but
I might also give strange answers, because i want you to research for the rest of the answer by using the combined power of those trillions of nerve cells inside your head.


If Windows Vista is the answer, how stupid must have been the question?
shuss's Avatar
shuss (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,431
Posted: 11-08-2002
whats a swap bay?
Mr. Belvedere's Avatar
Mr. Belvedere (MyCE Resident)
Posts: 15,624
Posted: 11-08-2002
Quote:
Originally posted by shuebhussain
whats a swap bay?
__________________
I might be evil... but
I might also give strange answers, because i want you to research for the rest of the answer by using the combined power of those trillions of nerve cells inside your head.


If Windows Vista is the answer, how stupid must have been the question?
default_avatar
Jon Jewell (New on Forum)
Posts: 29
Posted: 14-08-2002
I use NTFS, just because when I use my Premiere to capture movies I am not burdened by Fat32's 4gig limit (4gig=~18min). Ahh the joy of capturing a 60min tape in one pass. It's like a dream come true...
__________________
^insert wit-ful statement here...
default_avatar
kay_storms (New on Forum)
Posts: 3
Posted: 19-08-2002
I used NTFS for a couple years but I kept running into a problem in which the security descriptors would become corrupt and then all my data would just get crapped on. After losing everything time and time again...I decided I'd go with the older but easier to fix FAT32. Why doesn't microsoft use the bitchen filesystems that linux does... I vote for XFS.
Mr. Belvedere's Avatar
Mr. Belvedere (MyCE Resident)
Posts: 15,624
Posted: 19-08-2002
Quote:
Originally posted by kay_storms
I used NTFS for a couple years but I kept running into a problem in which the security descriptors would become corrupt and then all my data would just get crapped on. After losing everything time and time again...I decided I'd go with the older but easier to fix FAT32. Why doesn't microsoft use the bitchen filesystems that linux does... I vote for XFS.
Linux has its disadvantages as well. Ever tried to expand or shrink a volume or making backups of it on other hdds ?

And mounting can take forever.
__________________
I might be evil... but
I might also give strange answers, because i want you to research for the rest of the answer by using the combined power of those trillions of nerve cells inside your head.


If Windows Vista is the answer, how stupid must have been the question?
Dee-ehn's Avatar
Dee-ehn (Retired Administrator)
Posts: 15,203
Posted: 20-08-2002
I use them both.... on small partitions, containing important data (documents), I use FAT32 (in case of a crash, the FAT32 partitions are accessible from within DOS/Win9x, to secure the data).

On big partitions, used for video editing and such, I use NTFS.
__________________
Every answer is just a question away...

My other hobby is photography. Come take a look at what I do!




Help us fighting cancer!

Hardware tools: Prime95, Sandra, MemtestX86, MBM, DFT
CD/DVD: Smartripper, DVD Decrypter, DVD Shrink, ForceAspi

Check your CPU wattage online!

Linux: be root || Windows: reboot

lombok ijo's Avatar
lombok ijo (CD Freaks Junior Member)
Posts: 95
Posted: 21-08-2002
Code:
1. I use win98 on daily base, winxp only for burning and Internet
   since win 98 has more compatibility and faster even on 
   256 MB ram, while some burning program need NT engine.
2. My XP run on FAT32 since when things goes wrong its accessible
   though DOS, FAT 32 has no RollBack like NTFS but when things 
   going wrong at least I can get c.a. 75 - 80 % of my file back.
   Think if you have to do this on NTFS
__________________
Celeron 300A @ 375
ASUS P2B 256 MB
Quantum FireBall EX 6.4
LiteOn LTR-16102B
LiteOn LTR-40125S @ 48125W-vs02
ExpertTech's Avatar
ExpertTech (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,000
Posted: 27-08-2002
I use both.

Quote:
1. I use win98 on daily base, winxp only for burning and Internet
since win 98 has more compatibility and faster even on
256 MB ram, while some burning program need NT engine.
2. My XP run on FAT32 since when things goes wrong its accessible
though DOS, FAT 32 has no RollBack like NTFS but when things
going wrong at least I can get c.a. 75 - 80 % of my file back.
Think if you have to do this on NTFS
Hey, by the way were you able to install Win9X/ME over Win2K/XP. I currently use Win2K and have about four NTFS partitions and three FAT32 partitions (for accessibility using command prompt - I know Win2K console has it, but still...)

When I tried installing ME over 2K, I got a strange error saying could not create boot partition blah blah...and the Setup quit. Any ideas whether this is possible?
cloakdoa's Avatar
cloakdoa (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,457
Posted: 29-08-2002
NTFS on Winxp and Fat32 win2000/
__________________
Oh my, is that cd on fire?? I smell some hot plastics...

Look at the orange button at the top 6th over from the left. It says Search. You can use this to help !!!!
darshanjog's Avatar
darshanjog (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,588
Posted: 31-08-2002
NTFS is the best with XP.
__________________
Will be getting my hands on my new iPod Nano 2nd Gen 8 GB BLACK in a few days ...
BurnFre@k's Avatar
BurnFre@k (CD Freaks Senior Member)
Posts: 306
Posted: 31-08-2002
I use FAT 32
darshanjog's Avatar
darshanjog (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,588
Posted: 01-09-2002
NTFS is more efficient on big capacity drives & you lose little space.

I have a feeling that it is also faster than FAT32.
__________________
Will be getting my hands on my new iPod Nano 2nd Gen 8 GB BLACK in a few days ...
shuss's Avatar
shuss (CDFreaks Resident)
Posts: 1,431
Posted: 01-09-2002
i read also that NTFS is better for handaling large files for some reason buti forgot why... (i do not mean that ntfs can have file sizes bigger than 4GB which is another plus over fat32)

since most on these foums have cdrws and make images often which are bigger than 600MB i am not surprised most use ntfs.
There's more to MyCE.com

Listen up, we've got more. Product information on 102,541 products. Our experts have written 521 articles. We've gathered 16,068 news items for you to always keep updated.

Active Commenters

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:35.
Top