NeroLinux GUI

Hello guest,
default
To benefit from all extra features you need to log in or sign up.
Nero Linux Discuss, NeroLinux GUI at Nero & InCD forum; Current version is using Gtk+1 for GUI which is *cough* ancient *cough* compared to current GUI toolkits. I myself like to use KDE/Qt for programs I write but I guess Qt's licensing was a possible problem for Nero ( though even Adobe is using Qt now ) . So I

CartmanX's Avatar
CartmanX (CD Freaks Junior Member)
Posts: 78
Posted: 19-03-2005
Current version is using Gtk+1 for GUI which is *cough* ancient *cough* compared to current GUI toolkits. I myself like to use KDE/Qt for programs I write but I guess Qt's licensing was a possible problem for Nero ( though even Adobe is using Qt now ) . So I wonder if you will improve the GUI a bit like port it to GTK+ 2?
__________________
An Eye For Eye Will Make Whole World Blind
default_avatar
Today (MyCE Staff)
Posts: 15,596
default_avatar
Bobmeister (MyCE Junior Member)
Posts: 90
Posted: 19-03-2005
As meantioned on an earlier post (below), they used GTK1.2 because they thought it more compatible with the older versions of Linux that they wanted this to run on. I thought that a reasonable response, however, GTK2 would be nice. Maybe they can build a version with GTK2 and provide both, like the Mozilla Foundation was doing for quite a while.

Either way, I'm not so interested in the "prettyness" as I am the function, but a nice front end would be better in the future....
CartmanX's Avatar
CartmanX (CD Freaks Junior Member)
Posts: 78
Posted: 19-03-2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobmeister
As meantioned on an earlier post (below), they used GTK1.2 because they thought it more compatible with the older versions of Linux that they wanted this to run on. I thought that a reasonable response, however, GTK2 would be nice. Maybe they can build a version with GTK2 and provide both, like the Mozilla Foundation was doing for quite a while.

Either way, I'm not so interested in the "prettyness" as I am the function, but a nice front end would be better in the future....
Mozilla doesn't support Gtk+1 afaik. As far as functionality vs prettyness I say functionality+prettyness
__________________
An Eye For Eye Will Make Whole World Blind
default_avatar
Bobmeister (MyCE Junior Member)
Posts: 90
Posted: 20-03-2005
Well, I THOUGHT that Mozilla did, however, yeah, it's all the new stuff now. Hey, I agree....BOTH would be nice. But function is STILL MORE IMPORTANT that pretty. I would bet that they come out with a GTK2 version in the future...maybe alongside the other version! We'll see! I still haven't done a whole lot of burning in the last days so I haven't exploited this software the way I would like yet....I'm getting to it!
There's more to MyCE.com

Listen up, we've got more. Product information on 102,541 products. Our experts have written 521 articles. We've gathered 16,068 news items for you to always keep updated.

Posting Rules

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

Similar Threads

All times are GMT +2. The time now is 23:00.
Top